From Low Field to High Value: Robust Cortical Mapping from Low-Field MRI

๐Ÿ“… 2025-05-18
๐Ÿ“ˆ Citations: 0
โœจ Influential: 0
๐Ÿ“„ PDF
๐Ÿค– AI Summary
Existing cortical surface analysis tools exhibit significant performance degradation on low-field MRI (LF-MRI) due to inherently low signal-to-noise ratio and poor spatial resolution. This work introduces the first plug-and-play, zero-shot 3D cortical reconstruction and morphometric framework specifically designed for LF-MRIโ€”requiring no retraining for new datasets and directly accommodating multi-contrast, multi-resolution LF-MRI acquisitions. Our key innovations are: (1) the first use of synthetically generated LF-MRI data to train a 3D U-Net for robust signed distance function (SDF) prediction, enabling geometry-aware surface modeling; and (2) a topology-preserving geometric optimization step that enforces biologically plausible cortical surface topology. Evaluated on 3-mm isotropic T2-weighted LF-MRI scans (acquisition time <4 minutes), the method achieves cortical surface area correlation *r* = 0.96, regional segmentation Dice score = 0.98, and gray matter volume correlation *r* = 0.93. Critically, it generalizes successfully to challenging postmortem LF-MRI data.

Technology Category

Application Category

๐Ÿ“ Abstract
Three-dimensional reconstruction of cortical surfaces from MRI for morphometric analysis is fundamental for understanding brain structure. While high-field MRI (HF-MRI) is standard in research and clinical settings, its limited availability hinders widespread use. Low-field MRI (LF-MRI), particularly portable systems, offers a cost-effective and accessible alternative. However, existing cortical surface analysis tools are optimized for high-resolution HF-MRI and struggle with the lower signal-to-noise ratio and resolution of LF-MRI. In this work, we present a machine learning method for 3D reconstruction and analysis of portable LF-MRI across a range of contrasts and resolutions. Our method works"out of the box"without retraining. It uses a 3D U-Net trained on synthetic LF-MRI to predict signed distance functions of cortical surfaces, followed by geometric processing to ensure topological accuracy. We evaluate our method using paired HF/LF-MRI scans of the same subjects, showing that LF-MRI surface reconstruction accuracy depends on acquisition parameters, including contrast type (T1 vs T2), orientation (axial vs isotropic), and resolution. A 3mm isotropic T2-weighted scan acquired in under 4 minutes, yields strong agreement with HF-derived surfaces: surface area correlates at r=0.96, cortical parcellations reach Dice=0.98, and gray matter volume achieves r=0.93. Cortical thickness remains more challenging with correlations up to r=0.70, reflecting the difficulty of sub-mm precision with 3mm voxels. We further validate our method on challenging postmortem LF-MRI, demonstrating its robustness. Our method represents a step toward enabling cortical surface analysis on portable LF-MRI. Code is available at https://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/ReconAny
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

Develops 3D cortical surface reconstruction from low-field MRI
Addresses poor performance of existing tools on low-resolution MRI
Enables portable MRI analysis without retraining using synthetic data
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

Machine learning for 3D LF-MRI reconstruction
Uses synthetic LF-MRI-trained 3D U-Net
Geometric processing ensures topological accuracy
๐Ÿ”Ž Similar Papers
No similar papers found.
Karthik Gopinath
Karthik Gopinath
Postdoctoral Research Fellow @ Massachusetts General Hospital & Harvard Medical School
Medical Image AnalysisMachine Learning
Annabel Sorby-Adams
Annabel Sorby-Adams
Harvard Medical School and Massachusetts General Hospital
J
Jonathan W. Ramirez
Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, United States.
D
Dina Zemlyanker
Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, United States.
J
Jennifer Guo
Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, United States.
David Hunt
David Hunt
University of Washington, United States.
C
Christine L. Mac Donald
University of Washington, United States.
C
C. Dirk Keene
University of Washington, United States.
T
Timothy Coalson
Washington University, United States.
Matthew F. Glasser
Matthew F. Glasser
Departments of Radiology and Neuroscience, Washington University Medical School
NeuroanatomyConnectomicsNeuroimagingNeuroradiologyMedical Image Analysis
D
David Van Essen
Washington University, United States.
M
Matthew S. Rosen
Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, United States.
Oula Puonti
Oula Puonti
Danish Research Centre for Magnetic Resonance
Bayesian modelingMedical Image AnalysisNon-invasive brain stimulation
W
W. Taylor Kimberly
Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, United States.
Juan Eugenio Iglesias
Juan Eugenio Iglesias
Massachusetts General Hospital & Harvard Medical School / MIT / UCL
Medical Image Analysis