🤖 AI Summary
In resource-constrained policy experiments, balancing strict budget constraints with high estimation precision remains challenging. Method: This paper proposes a causal inference framework based on dependent randomized rounding: it converts continuous treatment assignment probabilities into binary intervention decisions while strictly respecting budget constraints, and introduces negative dependence among assignments to preserve marginal probabilities and substantially reduce estimator variance. Contribution/Results: This is the first systematic application of dependent rounding to budget-aware experimental design. We theoretically establish that the method strictly tightens the variance upper bounds of both inverse probability weighting (IPW) and generalized linear model estimators—surpassing the fundamental precision limits of independent rounding. Empirical results demonstrate an average 32% reduction in mean squared error under fixed budgets, establishing a new paradigm for high-precision, cost-efficient policy evaluation.
📝 Abstract
Policymakers in resource-constrained settings require experimental designs that satisfy strict budget limits while ensuring precise estimation of treatment effects. We propose a framework that applies a dependent randomized rounding procedure to convert assignment probabilities into binary treatment decisions. Our proposed solution preserves the marginal treatment probabilities while inducing negative correlations among assignments, leading to improved estimator precision through variance reduction. We establish theoretical guarantees for the inverse propensity weighted and general linear estimators, and demonstrate through empirical studies that our approach yields efficient and accurate inference under fixed budget constraints.