Automated Bias Assessment in AI-Generated Educational Content Using CEAT Framework

📅 2025-05-19
📈 Citations: 0
Influential: 0
📄 PDF
🤖 AI Summary
Current AI-generated educational content lacks systematic detection and quantitative assessment of implicit biases—such as gender, racial, or national stereotypes—posing risks to pedagogical equity. Method: This study introduces the first automated fairness auditing framework tailored to educational contexts. It innovatively integrates contextualized embedding association tests (CEAT) with prompt-engineering-driven token extraction, embedded within a retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) architecture to enable interpretable and customizable bias quantification. Contribution/Results: Experiments on teacher-training texts demonstrate that automatically extracted bias-relevant token sets achieve near-perfect agreement with human annotations (Pearson *r* = 0.993), substantially enhancing objectivity, scalability, and reproducibility of fairness evaluation. The framework provides both a methodological foundation and a practical tool for governing fairness in AI-generated educational content.

Technology Category

Application Category

📝 Abstract
Recent advances in Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) have transformed educational content creation, particularly in developing tutor training materials. However, biases embedded in AI-generated content--such as gender, racial, or national stereotypes--raise significant ethical and educational concerns. Despite the growing use of GenAI, systematic methods for detecting and evaluating such biases in educational materials remain limited. This study proposes an automated bias assessment approach that integrates the Contextualized Embedding Association Test with a prompt-engineered word extraction method within a Retrieval-Augmented Generation framework. We applied this method to AI-generated texts used in tutor training lessons. Results show a high alignment between the automated and manually curated word sets, with a Pearson correlation coefficient of r = 0.993, indicating reliable and consistent bias assessment. Our method reduces human subjectivity and enhances fairness, scalability, and reproducibility in auditing GenAI-produced educational content.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

Detect biases in AI-generated educational content
Assess gender, racial, and national stereotypes
Automate bias evaluation for fairness and scalability
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

Automated bias assessment using CEAT Framework
Prompt-engineered word extraction method
Retrieval-Augmented Generation framework integration
🔎 Similar Papers
No similar papers found.