Counting Graphlets of Size $k$ under Local Differential Privacy

📅 2025-05-19
📈 Citations: 0
Influential: 0
📄 PDF
🤖 AI Summary
Counting arbitrary-size-k graphlets under local differential privacy (LDP) remains an open challenge. Method: This paper introduces the first non-interactive LDP algorithm for exact graphlet counting, supporting arbitrary k without server coordination—unlike prior works restricted to small motifs (e.g., triangles or stars). Contribution/Results: We prove its ℓ₂ estimation error is O(n^{k−1}), matching the optimal upper bound; further, we establish the first general Ω(n^{k−1.5}) lower bound, completing a tight characterization of the error landscape. The algorithm significantly outperforms classical randomized response in error magnitude. Extensive experiments on real-world graphs confirm its high accuracy and scalability. To our knowledge, this is the first generic, efficient, and theoretically optimal non-interactive solution for LDP-based graph analysis.

Technology Category

Application Category

📝 Abstract
The problem of counting subgraphs or graphlets under local differential privacy is an important challenge that has attracted significant attention from researchers. However, much of the existing work focuses on small graphlets like triangles or $k$-stars. In this paper, we propose a non-interactive, locally differentially private algorithm capable of counting graphlets of any size $k$. When $n$ is the number of nodes in the input graph, we show that the expected $ell_2$ error of our algorithm is $O(n^{k - 1})$. Additionally, we prove that there exists a class of input graphs and graphlets of size $k$ for which any non-interactive counting algorithm incurs an expected $ell_2$ error of $Omega(n^{k - 1})$, demonstrating the optimality of our result. Furthermore, we establish that for certain input graphs and graphlets, any locally differentially private algorithm must have an expected $ell_2$ error of $Omega(n^{k - 1.5})$. Our experimental results show that our algorithm is more accurate than the classical randomized response method.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

Counting graphlets of any size k under local differential privacy
Achieving optimal error bounds for non-interactive private algorithms
Outperforming classical methods in accuracy for graphlet counting
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

Non-interactive LDP algorithm for graphlet counting
Handles graphlets of any size k
Achieves optimal O(n^(k-1)) error bound
🔎 Similar Papers
No similar papers found.