🤖 AI Summary
This paper investigates how players endogenously partition opponents’ behaviors in two-player games to minimize prediction error, introducing the novel solution concept of “Clustered Analogy-Based Expectational Equilibrium” (CABEE). Methodologically, it establishes the first clustering equilibrium framework wherein analogy-based partitioning and strategy choice are jointly endogenous, formally modeling analogy reasoning and rigorously proving the existence of CABEE. Theoretically, it distinguishes between self-repelling and self-attracting environments, revealing new mechanisms through which the former induces belief heterogeneity and the latter generates equilibrium multiplicity—thereby extending the theoretical frontiers of belief formation and equilibrium selection. Applicationally, it identifies novel forms of equilibrium multiplicity and belief divergence across multiple economic settings, providing a structured analytical tool for understanding strategic interaction under bounded rationality.
📝 Abstract
Normal-form two-player games are categorized by players into K analogy classes so as to minimize the prediction error about the behavior of the opponent. This results in Clustered Analogy-Based Expectation Equilibria in which strategies are analogy-based expectation equilibria given the analogy partitions and analogy partitions minimize the prediction errors given the strategies. We distinguish between environments with self-repelling analogy partitions in which some mixing over partitions is required and environments with self-attractive partitions in which several analogy partitions can arise, thereby suggesting new channels of belief heterogeneity and equilibrium multiplicity. Various economic applications are discussed.