Can You Link Up With Treewidth?

📅 2024-10-03
🏛️ Symposium on Theoretical Aspects of Computer Science
📈 Citations: 0
Influential: 0
📄 PDF
🤖 AI Summary
This paper addresses the colorful subgraph detection problem within the framework of parameterized complexity, introducing a novel graph parameter—*linkage capacity*—to uniformly characterize conditional time lower bounds. Methodologically, it pioneers the use of Beneš networks—replacing traditional expander-based arguments—combined with ETH-based reductions, random graph analysis, and treewidth correlation analysis. Key contributions are: (1) proving that graphs of treewidth $t$ have linkage capacity $Omega(t/log t)$, and establishing a tight $Theta(k)$ bound for most dense graphs; (2) deriving a conditional lower bound of $n^{o(gamma(H))}$ for detecting a colorful $H$-subgraph, where $gamma(H)$ is precisely characterized by the linkage capacity of $H$; and (3) obtaining new tight lower bounds for induced subgraph counting, thereby simplifying and generalizing Marx’s seminal result to a broader class of graphs.

Technology Category

Application Category

📝 Abstract
In a fundamental paper in parameterized complexity theory, Marx [ToC '10] constructed $k$-vertex graphs $H$ of maximum degree $3$ such that $n^{o(k /log k)}$ time algorithms for detecting colorful $H$-subgraphs would refute the Exponential-Time Hypothesis (ETH). This result is widely used to obtain almost-tight conditional lower bounds for parameterized problems under ETH. We give a new and fully self-contained proof of this result that further simplifies a recent work by Karthik et al. [SOSA 2024]. In our proof, we introduce a novel graph parameter of independent interest, the linkage capacity $gamma(H)$, and show that detecting colorful $H$-subgraphs in time $n^{o(gamma(H))}$ refutes ETH. Then, we use a simple construction of communication networks credited to Benev{s} to obtain $k$-vertex graphs of maximum degree $3$ and linkage capacity $Omega(k / log k)$, avoiding arguments involving expander graphs, which were required in previous papers. We also show that every graph $H$ of treewidth $t$ has linkage capacity $Omega(t / log t)$, thus recovering a stronger result shown by Marx [ToC '10] with a simplified proof. Additionally, we obtain new tight lower bounds on the complexity of colorful subgraph detection for certain types of patterns by analyzing their linkage capacity: We prove that almost all $k$-vertex graphs of polynomial average degree $Omega(k^{eta})$ for $eta>0$ have linkage capacity $Theta(k)$, which implies tight lower bounds for finding such patterns $H$. As an application of these results, we also obtain tight lower bounds for counting small induced subgraphs having a fixed property $Phi$, improving bounds from, e.g., [Roth et al., FOCS 2020].
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

Detecting colorful H-subgraphs refutes ETH
Linkage capacity determines subgraph detection complexity
Treewidth bounds linkage capacity in graphs
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

Introduces linkage capacity γ(H) for subgraph detection
Uses Beneš networks to simplify expander graph arguments
Links treewidth to linkage capacity Ω(t/log t)
🔎 Similar Papers
No similar papers found.