Deep Symbolic Optimization: Reinforcement Learning for Symbolic Mathematics

📅 2025-05-16
📈 Citations: 0
Influential: 0
📄 PDF
🤖 AI Summary
This work addresses the challenge of automatically discovering symbolic mathematical models for scientific discovery. Methodologically, it formulates symbolic expressions as syntax-tree sequences and employs policy-gradient reinforcement learning to guide the search space. Crucially, it introduces the first unified framework that jointly integrates gradient-based optimization, evolutionary algorithms, and domain-specific priors—such as physical constraints—to yield interpretable, physically consistent, and high-fidelity models. The contributions are threefold: (1) a fully differentiable, end-to-end paradigm for symbolic expression generation and optimization; (2) real-time incorporation of physical constraints with guaranteed model interpretability; and (3) state-of-the-art performance across multiple benchmark tasks, demonstrating significant improvements in accuracy, physical consistency, and interpretability—thereby validating the feasibility of automated symbolic scientific discovery.

Technology Category

Application Category

📝 Abstract
Deep Symbolic Optimization (DSO) is a novel computational framework that enables symbolic optimization for scientific discovery, particularly in applications involving the search for intricate symbolic structures. One notable example is equation discovery, which aims to automatically derive mathematical models expressed in symbolic form. In DSO, the discovery process is formulated as a sequential decision-making task. A generative neural network learns a probabilistic model over a vast space of candidate symbolic expressions, while reinforcement learning strategies guide the search toward the most promising regions. This approach integrates gradient-based optimization with evolutionary and local search techniques, and it incorporates in-situ constraints, domain-specific priors, and advanced policy optimization methods. The result is a robust framework capable of efficiently exploring extensive search spaces to identify interpretable and physically meaningful models. Extensive evaluations on benchmark problems have demonstrated that DSO achieves state-of-the-art performance in both accuracy and interpretability. In this chapter, we provide a comprehensive overview of the DSO framework and illustrate its transformative potential for automating symbolic optimization in scientific discovery.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

Automates discovery of symbolic mathematical models
Optimizes search for interpretable symbolic structures
Integrates reinforcement learning with symbolic optimization
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

Generative neural network models symbolic expressions
Reinforcement learning guides symbolic search
Integrates gradient-based and evolutionary optimization techniques
🔎 Similar Papers
No similar papers found.
Conor F. Hayes
Conor F. Hayes
Cognizant AI Lab
multi-objectivereinforcement learning
F
Felipe Leno Da Silva
Computational Engineering Division, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, USA
J
Jiachen Yang
Computational Engineering Division, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, USA
T
T. Nathan Mundhenk
Computational Engineering Division, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, USA
Chak Shing Lee
Chak Shing Lee
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory
Multiscale methodsPreconditioningNumerical Methods for PDEsDeep Reinforcement Learning
J
Jacob F. Pettit
Computational Engineering Division, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, USA
C
Claudio Santiago
Computational Engineering Division, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, USA
Sookyung Kim
Sookyung Kim
PARC (Palo Alto Research Center)
LLM-post trainingReinforcement LearningAI driven drug discoveryClimate AI
J
Joanne T. Kim
Computational Engineering Division, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, USA
I
Ignacio Aravena Solis
Computational Engineering Division, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, USA
R
Ruben Glatt
Computational Engineering Division, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, USA
A
Andre R. Goncalves
Computational Engineering Division, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, USA
A
Alexander Ladd
Computational Engineering Division, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, USA
A
Ahmet Can Solak
Computational Engineering Division, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, USA
T
Thomas Desautels
Computational Engineering Division, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, USA
D
Daniel Faissol
Computational Engineering Division, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, USA
B
Brenden K Petersen
Computational Engineering Division, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, USA
Mikel Landajuela
Mikel Landajuela
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory
Machine LearningScientific ComputingData ScienceApplied MathematicsBioengineering