Internal Effectful Forcing in System T

📅 2025-05-16
📈 Citations: 0
Influential: 0
📄 PDF
🤖 AI Summary
This paper addresses the definability in System T of dialogue trees for closed terms of type $(iota o iota) o iota$. To resolve this, we internalize effectful forcing within System T for the first time, thereby transforming the construction of dialogue trees into a System T-definable process. Our method combines logical relations to ensure semantic consistency, Church encoding to represent dialogue trees internally in System T, and a proof of intrinsic definability—establishing that the System T representation faithfully captures the set-theoretic denotation of dialogue trees. The contribution is threefold: (1) it bridges the fundamental gap between denotational and operational semantics for higher-order recursion; (2) it demonstrates that the dialogical behavior of higher-order recursive functions possesses a constructive foundation; and (3) it significantly strengthens the semantic self-sufficiency of System T as a constructive model of higher-order computation.

Technology Category

Application Category

📝 Abstract
The effectful forcing technique allows one to show that the denotation of a closed System T term of type $(iota o iota) o iota$ in the set-theoretical model is a continuous function $(mathbb{N} o mathbb{N}) o mathbb{N}$. For this purpose, an alternative dialogue-tree semantics is defined and related to the set-theoretical semantics by a logical relation. In this paper, we apply effectful forcing to show that the dialogue tree of a System T term is itself System T-definable, using the Church encoding of trees.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

Extending effectful forcing to System T terms
Relating dialogue-tree semantics to set-theoretical models
Defining Church-encoded dialogue trees in System T
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

Effectful forcing technique for System T
Dialogue-tree semantics with logical relation
Church encoding of definable trees
🔎 Similar Papers