Auditing Contextual Bias in Human Ball-Strike Calls Using KBO's Automated Umpiring Transition

📅 2026-09-03
📈 Citations: 0
Influential: 0
📄 PDF
🤖 AI Summary
本文利用韩国棒球组织的自动好坏球判定系统,审计了关于人类裁判在不同情境下的好坏球判罚偏见问题。
📝 Abstract
This paper uses the Korean Baseball Organization's adoption of the Automated Ball-Strike (ABS) system to audit long-standing claims about contextual bias in human ball-strike calls. Using pitch-level KBO data from 2021 through the available portion of the 2026 season, we model called-strike probability for taken pitches near the strike-zone boundary, with 2022-2023 as the primary human-umpire baseline and ABS seasons (2024 and onward) as a diagnostic benchmark. The strongest evidence concerns count pressure. Relative to 0--0 counts, human umpires called substantially fewer strikes in two-strike counts and more strikes in hitter-ahead three-ball counts. Specifically, in the main 0.25-ft boundary band, 0--2 was associated with a -17.17 percentage-point effect and 3--0 with a +6.61 percentage-point effect. Under ABS, the corresponding effects were close to zero and did not survive false-discovery-rate correction. Game progression shows a smaller but coherent pattern as human calls were less strike-prone in early innings and more strike-prone in innings 7--9+, especially in late-close situations, while complete ABS seasons were essentially flat. Other suspected biases are weaker or more localized. Salary-based reputation proxies provide suggestive but proxy-sensitive evidence, and catcher identity shows human-period residual heterogeneity that disappears under ABS. Home-context evidence is mostly null at the umpire level, with one FDR-significant human-period exception and an exploratory umpire-team gap best treated as an audit lead. Overall, the results do not show that human umpires were biased everywhere. Instead, they map where the human strike zone was most context-sensitive, where evidence was weaker, and where common suspicions received little support.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

contextual bias
human ball-strike calls
automated umpiring
KBO
ABS system
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

Automated Ball-Strike (ABS)
contextual bias
human umpires
count pressure
game progression