Credible Discourse on Climate Policy: Beyond Dueling Certitudes

๐Ÿ“… 2026-09-08
๐Ÿ“ˆ Citations: 0
โœจ Influential: 0
๐Ÿ“„ PDF
๐Ÿค– AI Summary
ๆœฌๆ–‡้’ˆๅฏน็พŽๅ›ฝๆฐ”ๅ€™ๆ”ฟ็ญ–ไธญ็ง‘ๅญฆไธŽๆ„่ฏ†ๅฝขๆ€็บ ็ผ ็š„้—ฎ้ข˜๏ผŒ้‡‡็”จ็ฆๅˆฉ็ปๆตŽๅญฆๆ–นๆณ•่ฟ›่กŒ้€ๆ˜Ž็š„่ฏ„ไผฐๅ’Œๆƒ่กกๅˆ†ๆžใ€‚
๐Ÿ“ Abstract
Whatever the policy question under consideration, reasoned and realistic evaluation requires credible policy analysis under uncertainty. This holds particularly to the study of climate policy in the United States, where science and ideology have become increasingly entangled. Welfare economics provides a transparent formal framework to describe and evaluate the subtle tradeoffs that must be addressed when comparing alternative climate policies. The largely qualitative discussions of climate policy in public-facing reports suffer from failure to use welfare economics to assess tradeoffs. I use 2025 reports by the National Academies and by the US Department of Energy as case studies.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

climate policy
welfare economics
uncertainty
ideology
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

welfare economics
climate policy
tradeoffs
uncertainty
๐Ÿ”Ž Similar Papers
No similar papers found.