🤖 AI Summary
This study examines how money, identity, and information interact to reconfigure electoral politics and regime legitimacy across five countries—the United States, India, Germany, China, and Russia. It identifies a self-reinforcing feedback loop: campaign and state financing fuels identity-based mobilization (e.g., race, caste, nationalism); social media and microtargeted communication amplify societal cleavages; and these dynamics jointly reinforce each other. In democracies, the loop intensifies polarization, erodes institutional trust, and undermines issue-based governance; in non-democracies, it bolsters regime narratives. Methodologically, the paper develops the first cross-regime triadic feedback model—departing from unidimensional analyses—and integrates political economy, social identity theory, and media studies. Comparative case analysis across the five nations validates both shared mechanisms and context-specific variations. The findings offer theoretical foundations and policy warnings for strengthening democratic resilience and reforming digital-era governance.
📝 Abstract
This article examines the interplay of money, identity, and information as a pivotal triad reshaping electoral politics and legitimacy in modern democracies, with insights from the United States, India, Germany, China, and Russia. Financial resources, through campaign finance and state funds, enable strategies exploiting identity cleavages like race, caste, and nationalism, amplified by digital networks such as social media and targeted messaging. In democracies, this dynamic fosters polarization and erodes trust, while in non democracies, it bolsters regime narratives. Drawing on political economy, social identity theory, and media studies, the study reveals a feedback loop: money shapes identity appeals, information disseminates them, and power consolidates, challenging issue based governance assumptions. Comparative analysis highlights the triad universal yet context specific impact, underscoring the need for reforms to address its effects on democratic theory and practice, as it entrenches elite influence and tribal divisions across diverse political systems.