Accuracy is Not Enough: A Divergence-Based Approach to Evaluate Fidelity Loss in Quantized LLMs

📅 2026-09-07
📈 Citations: 0
Influential: 0
📄 PDF
🤖 AI Summary
论文提出了一种基于分布差异的方法来评估量化大型语言模型的保真度损失,通过计算全精度和量化模型之间的统计距离,提供了比仅依赖准确率更细致的分析。
📝 Abstract
Deployment of Large Language Models (LLMs) on memory-constrained edge devices relies heavily on aggressive post-training quantization. However, evaluating these models is largely based on zero-shot task accuracy, which depends solely on argmax predictions and is insensitive to changes in the underlying predictive distribution. Consequently, accuracy can exhibit unstable, non-monotonic behavior under progressive quantization, masking substantial fidelity loss relative to the BFloat16 (BF16) uncompressed base model and providing misleading deployment signals. We introduce a distribution-sensitive evaluation framework quantifying information loss in quantized LLMs as the divergence between full-vocabulary predictive distributions at the token decision boundary. We compute statistical distances, including Jensen-Shannon Divergence and Total Variation Distance, between outputs of full-precision and quantized models, enabling a fine-grained analysis of distributional shift. Using this framework, we quantify probability mass displacement and distributional drift relative to the BF16 reference, capturing predictive distribution changes not reflected in top-1 accuracy. We conduct a 120-run experimental matrix across five foundation architectures and four reasoning benchmarks under progressive quantization regimes, from uncompressed BF16 to Q2_K, providing a systematic fidelity analysis. Our results show divergence metrics generally increase under stronger quantization, complementing task accuracy with a fidelity signal. Across tested llama.cpp schemes, mixed-precision Q4_K generally yields lower divergence than uniform Q4_0 at similar memory footprints. These findings motivate distribution-aware evaluation as a practical diagnostic complement to task accuracy; they do not directly establish correctness, calibration, safety, or user-perceived quality.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

quantization
fidelity loss
predictive distribution
accuracy
divergence
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

Divergence-based Evaluation
Quantized LLMs
Jensen-Shannon Divergence
Total Variation Distance
Predictive Distribution
🔎 Similar Papers
No similar papers found.