🤖 AI Summary
本文提出了一种Compensability Capacity Assessment (CCA)方法，用于评估供应商选择时的预期应付账款减免及其可能的时间，通过分析749,952张发票验证了该方法的有效性。
📝 Abstract
Supplier selection affects not only operating performance but also the payable network entered by a new obligation. This paper develops the Compensability Capacity Assessment (CCA), an ex ante buyer-supplier measure of expected gross payable relief and its likely timing. CPM provides the bounded structural kernel; concave CCA variants add bilateral invoice capacity. The measure is tested on 749,952 analytical invoices issued during 2012-2023, using frozen nine-month histories and future weekly, monthly, quarterly, semester, and annual windows. Cycle-restricted and path-enabled clearing are independent outcome-generating environments used to validate the measure, not technologies compared by this study. Across seven fully observed quarters in 2022-2023, log-CCA has a median Spearman correlation of 0.638 with future integrated relief; persistent relations carry 93.5% of relief, and the highest-scoring relation captures 92.5% of buyer-specific best relief. Predictability remains positive from week to year, with quarterly recalibration providing the best operating balance between signal, coverage, and timeliness. A timing analysis shows that, across the two validation environments, 89-91% of attributed relief occurs within seven days of invoice issue and 94-96% within thirty days, on average about sixteen days before contractual maturity. Log-CCA correlates 0.564 with thirty-day relief and 0.566 with relief-days. Its highest quartile has a 96.5% median probability of thirty-day compensation, compared with 57.6% in the lowest quartile. Conditional waiting-time prediction is weaker, so CCA should rank timely compensation opportunity rather than forecast an exact payment date. The findings link supplier placement, financial circularity, and working-capital exposure while motivating deployment, causal testing, and quarterly drift monitoring.