ExecuCritic: Calibrated Critic Shaping for Code Generation with Verifiable Rewards

๐Ÿ“… 2026-09-14
๐Ÿ“ˆ Citations: 0
โœจ Influential: 0
๐Ÿ“„ PDF
๐Ÿค– AI Summary
ๆๅ‡บExecuCriticๆก†ๆžถ๏ผŒ้€š่ฟ‡่ฎญ็ปƒ็ผ–็ ๅ™จๅ’Œๆ‰น่ฏ„่€…ๆฅ่งฃๅ†ณไปฃ็ ็”Ÿๆˆไธญ็š„ๅฅ–ๅŠฑๅˆ†้…้—ฎ้ข˜๏ผŒๆ้ซ˜ไปฃ็ ็”Ÿๆˆ็š„ๅ‡†็กฎๆ€งใ€‚
๐Ÿ“ Abstract
Execution feedback is a useful supervision signal for code models because unit tests are objective and directly measure program correctness. Its weakness is that an entire program is often reduced to one pass or fail bit, leaving RLVR to solve a difficult credit assignment problem. At the same time, coding systems often include separate reviewer or tester roles, but these critics are usually prompted rather than trained and are not calibrated against execution. We propose ExecuCritic, a joint training framework in which a coder and a critic are updated on the same execution rollouts. The critic predicts pass or fail outcomes and gives short diagnostic feedback; the coder uses this signal only when the critic agrees with the executor on the current rollout group. Across eight code benchmarks and two recent open backbones, ExecuCritic improves over GRPO without a critic, prompted reviewer systems and scalar reward model baselines, while requiring fewer policy gradient steps and fewer sandbox executions. Ablations and reliability analyses suggest that the gains come from better credit assignment rather than larger sampling budgets.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

execution feedback
credit assignment problem
critic calibration
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

ExecuCritic
joint training framework
credit assignment
execution feedback
verifiable rewards
๐Ÿ”Ž Similar Papers