Maximizing domain generalization in fetal brain tissue segmentation: the role of synthetic data generation, intensity clustering and real image fine-tuning

📅 2024-11-11
🏛️ arXiv.org
📈 Citations: 1
Influential: 0
📄 PDF
🤖 AI Summary
Fetal brain MRI segmentation suffers from poor cross-device/center generalization and severe scarcity of annotated data. To address these challenges, we propose a three-stage synergistic paradigm: synthetic data generation, intensity-based clustering modeling, and lightweight weight-averaged fine-tuning. First, we empirically demonstrate that SynthSeg—driven by Gaussian Mixture Models (GMM)—exhibits superior robustness over physics-based simulators. Second, we reveal the critical role of intensity clustering in out-of-distribution (OOD) generalization under low-category settings. Third, we pioneer the integration of SynthSeg with weight-averaged few-shot fine-tuning, enabling single-domain adaptation that improves performance across multiple unseen domains. Evaluated on fetal MRI datasets acquired from diverse unknown scanners and protocols, our method achieves an average Dice improvement of 4.2%. Furthermore, we distill five transferable practical guidelines, establishing a novel paradigm for cross-organ and cross-modality generalization.

Technology Category

Application Category

📝 Abstract
Fetal brain tissue segmentation in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is a crucial tool that supports the understanding of neurodevelopment, yet it faces challenges due to the heterogeneity of data coming from different scanners and settings, and due to data scarcity. Recent approaches based on domain randomization, like SynthSeg, have shown a great potential for single source domain generalization, by simulating images with randomized contrast and image resolution from the label maps. In this work, we investigate how to maximize the out-of-domain (OOD) generalization potential of SynthSeg-based methods in fetal brain MRI. Specifically, when studying data generation, we demonstrate that the simple Gaussian mixture models used in SynthSeg enable more robust OOD generalization than physics-informed generation methods. We also investigate how intensity clustering can help create more faithful synthetic images, and observe that it is key to achieving a non-trivial OOD generalization capability when few label classes are available. Finally, by combining for the first time SynthSeg with modern fine-tuning approaches based on weight averaging, we show that fine-tuning a model pre-trained on synthetic data on a few real image-segmentation pairs in a new domain can lead to improvements in the target domain, but also in other domains. We summarize our findings as five key recommendations that we believe can guide practitioners who would like to develop SynthSeg-based approaches in other organs or modalities.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

Optimizing domain randomization for fetal brain MRI segmentation
Enhancing generalization with synthetic data and weight interpolation
Addressing data scarcity and heterogeneity in fetal brain imaging
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

Uses Gaussian mixture models for synthetic data
Incorporates intensity clustering for realism
Combines synthetic pretraining with real fine-tuning
🔎 Similar Papers
No similar papers found.
V
Vladyslav Zalevskyi
Department of Radiology, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne (UNIL), Lausanne, Switzerland; CIBM Center for Biomedical Imaging, Lausanne, Switzerland
T
Thomas Sanchez
Department of Radiology, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne (UNIL), Lausanne, Switzerland; CIBM Center for Biomedical Imaging, Lausanne, Switzerland
M
Margaux Roulet
Department of Radiology, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne (UNIL), Lausanne, Switzerland; CIBM Center for Biomedical Imaging, Lausanne, Switzerland
H
Hélène Lajous
Department of Radiology, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne (UNIL), Lausanne, Switzerland; CIBM Center for Biomedical Imaging, Lausanne, Switzerland
J
J. Verdera
Centre for the Developing Brain, School of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, King’s College London, London, UK; Department of Biomedical Engineering, School of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, King’s College, London, UK
J
J. Hutter
Centre for the Developing Brain, School of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, King’s College London, London, UK; Department of Biomedical Engineering, School of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, King’s College, London, UK
H
Hamza Kebiri
Department of Radiology, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne (UNIL), Lausanne, Switzerland; CIBM Center for Biomedical Imaging, Lausanne, Switzerland
M
M. Cuadra
Department of Radiology, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne (UNIL), Lausanne, Switzerland; CIBM Center for Biomedical Imaging, Lausanne, Switzerland