Soft Contamination Means Benchmarks Test Shallow Generalization

2026-02-12

Technology Category

• Natural Language Processing: (Large) Language Models
• Machine Learning: Large Multimodal Models (LMMs)
• Computer Vision: Large Vision Models

Application Category

• Semantics and Knowledge: Methods to enhance, augment, integrate or synergize semantic models such as knowledge graphs and LLMs
• Search and Retrieval-Augmented AI: Web evaluation methodologies and metrics
• Web Mining and Content Analysis: Large pretrained models with web data

Abstract

If LLM training data is polluted with benchmark test data, then benchmark performance gives biased estimates of out-of-distribution (OOD) generalization. Typical decontamination filters use n-gram matching which fail to detect semantic duplicates: sentences with equivalent (or near-equivalent) content that are not close in string space. We study this soft contamination of training data by semantic duplicates. Among other experiments, we embed the Olmo3 training corpus and find that: 1) contamination remains widespread, e.g. we find semantic duplicates for 78% of CodeForces and exact duplicates for 50% of ZebraLogic problems; 2) including semantic duplicates of benchmark data in training does improve benchmark performance; and 3) when finetuning on duplicates of benchmark datapoints, performance also improves on truly-held-out datapoints from the same benchmark. We argue that recent benchmark gains are thus confounded: the prevalence of soft contamination means gains reflect both genuine capability improvements and the accumulation of test data and effective test data in growing training corpora.

Problem

• soft contamination
• benchmark bias
• semantic duplicates
• out-of-distribution generalization
• training data pollution

Innovation

• soft contamination
• semantic duplicates
• benchmark decontamination
• out-of-distribution generalization
• training data leakage