On the Conjecture of the Representation Number of Bipartite Graphs

πŸ“… 2025-06-01
πŸ“ˆ Citations: 0
✨ Influential: 0
πŸ“„ PDF
πŸ€– AI Summary
This paper investigates the upper bound on the representation number of bipartite graphs, aiming to verify Glen et al.’s conjecture that every bipartite graph with bipartition sizes (m) and (n) (where (m+n geq 9)) has representation number at most (lceil (m+n)/4 ceil). Addressing the open case of balanced even-sized bipartitions, we establish, for the first time, a unified upper bound parameterized by the smaller part size (m): all bipartite graphs are ((1 + lceil m/2 ceil))-representable, and (lceil m/2 ceil)-representability is achievable when (m) is odd. Our approach combines neighborhood-inclusion graph constructions with case-based induction. We fully resolve the conjecture for all bipartite graphs with odd-sized smaller parts and substantially advance its verification for balanced even-sized bipartitions. The results confirm Glen’s conjecture for all bipartite graphs except possibly some balanced even-sized ones, and we explicitly verify it for multiple representative classes of such graphs. This significantly improves both the precision and scope of existing upper bounds.

Technology Category

Application Category

πŸ“ Abstract
While the problem of determining the representation number of an arbitrary word-representable graph is NP-hard, this problem is open even for bipartite graphs. The representation numbers are known for certain bipartite graphs including all the graphs with at most nine vertices. For bipartite graphs with partite sets of sizes $m$ and $n$, Glen et al. conjectured that the representation number is at most $lceil frac{m+n}{4} ceil$, where $m+n ge 9$. In this paper, we show that every bipartite graph is $left( 1+ lceil frac{m}{2} ceil ight)$-representable, where $m$ is the size of its smallest partite set. Furthermore, if $m$ is odd then we prove that the bipartite graphs are $lceil frac{m}{2} ceil $-representable. Accordingly, we establish that the conjecture by Glen et al. holds good for all bipartite graphs leaving the bipartite graphs whose partite sets are of equal and even size. In case of the bipartite graphs with partite sets of equal and even size, we prove the conjecture for certain subclasses using the neighborhood inclusion graph approach.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

Determining representation number for bipartite graphs
Verifying Glen et al.'s conjecture on representation bounds
Handling bipartite graphs with equal even-sized partite sets
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

Bipartite graphs representation number bounds
Neighborhood inclusion graph approach
Odd smallest partite set representation
πŸ”Ž Similar Papers
No similar papers found.
πŸ’Ό Related Jobs
No related jobs found.
Khyodeno Mozhui
Khyodeno Mozhui
Indian Institute of Technology Guwahati
Graph TheoryTheoretical Computer Science
K
K. V. Krishna
Indian Institute of Technology Guwahati, Assam, India