๐ค AI Summary
This paper addresses the Turing decidability of polynomial inequalities involving subset densities and additive energy in additive combinatorics: given an inequality of the form $p(delta_A, delta_B, dots) geq 0$, does it hold universally for all subsets of all finite abelian groups? Extending the HatamiโNorine method for undecidability of graph density inequalities to additive combinatorics, the authors employ a deep synthesis of algebraic constructions, graph embeddings, and discrete Fourier analysis to prove that this decision problem is Turing-undecidable in general. Their main contributions are threefold: (1) establishing the undecidability of polynomial inequalities in subset densities; (2) concurrently proving the undecidability of analogous inequalities involving additive energy; and (3) uncovering the intrinsic computational complexity of density problems in additive combinatorics, thereby forging profound connections among subset density, Fourier-analytic methods, and algebraic structure.
๐ Abstract
Many results in extremal graph theory can be formulated as certain polynomial inequalities in graph homomorphism densities. Answering fundamental questions raised by Lov{'a}sz, Szegedy and Razborov, Hatami and Norine proved that determining the validity of an arbitrary such polynomial inequality in graph homomorphism densities is undecidable. We observe that many results in additive combinatorics can also be formulated as polynomial inequalities in subset's density and its variants. Based on techniques introduced in Hatami and Norine, together with algebraic and graph construction and Fourier analysis, we prove similarly two theorems of undecidability, thus showing that establishing such polynomial inequalities in additive combinatorics are inherently difficult in their full generality.