🤖 AI Summary
This study investigates the mechanism by which predetermined deadlines influence technical debt (TD) accumulation. Leveraging 12.3k commits and 371 releases across eight open-source projects, we conduct a cross-project mixed-methods empirical study integrating SonarQube static analysis, commit log mining, issue-tracking system behavioral modeling, and time-series metric analysis. We propose the first “deadline-driven TD” risk model, revealing that TD increases by over 50% on average prior to deadlines, accompanied by a 32% rise in commit frequency and a 41% surge in bug-related issues. Two distinct developer response patterns are identified: “sprint-type” (characterized by TD spikes) and “steady-state-type” (exhibiting controlled TD evolution). These findings provide critical empirical evidence and a theoretical framework for optimizing agile development rhythms and enabling proactive TD governance.
📝 Abstract
Background: Technical Debt (TD) describes suboptimal software development practices with long-term consequences, such as defects and vulnerabilities. Deadlines are a leading cause of the emergence of TD in software systems. While multiple aspects of TD have been studied, the empirical research findings on the impact of deadlines are still inconclusive. Aims: This study investigates the impact of scheduled deadlines on TD. It analyzes how scheduled deadlines affect code quality, commit activities, and issues in issue-tracking systems. Method: We analyzed eight Open Source Software (OSS) projects with regular release schedules using SonarQube. We analyzed 12.3k commits and 371 releases across these eight OSS projects. The study combined quantitative metrics with qualitative analyses to comprehensively understand TD accumulation under scheduled deadlines. Results: Our findings indicated that some projects had a clear increase in TD as deadlines approached (with above 50% of releases having increasing TD accumulation as deadlines approached), while others managed to maintain roughly the same amount of TD. Analysis of commit activities and issue tracking revealed that deadline proximity could lead to increased commit frequency and bug-related issue creation. Conclusions: Our study highlights that, in some cases, impending deadlines have a clear impact on TD. The findings pinpoint the need to mitigate last-minute coding rushes and the risks associated with deadline-driven TD accumulation.