An Active Inference perspective on Neurofeedback Training

📅 2025-05-06
📈 Citations: 0
Influential: 0
📄 PDF
🤖 AI Summary
Neural feedback training (NFT) suffers from high inter-individual variability and poorly understood neurocognitive mechanisms, hindering its clinical translation. To address this, we introduce the active inference framework—systematically and for the first time—to formalize NFT as a closed-loop computational process. Our model quantitatively characterizes how feedback quality, biomarker validity, and participants’ prior beliefs jointly shape self-regulation learning. Using Bayesian hierarchical modeling and computational neuroscience simulations, we demonstrate that feedback noise and prior beliefs interact nonlinearly to determine training outcomes—challenging the assumption that higher-fidelity feedback universally improves performance. The model decomposes sources of NFT variability across feedback, neural signal, and cognitive domains, enabling principled interpretation of empirical findings, robustness assessment of protocols, and rational design of personalized NFT interventions. This work provides a computationally grounded theoretical framework and actionable methodology for advancing NFT research and application.

Technology Category

Application Category

📝 Abstract
Neurofeedback training (NFT) aims to teach self-regulation of brain activity through real-time feedback, but suffers from highly variable outcomes and poorly understood mechanisms, hampering its validation. To address these issues, we propose a formal computational model of the NFT closed loop. Using Active Inference, a Bayesian framework modelling perception, action, and learning, we simulate agents interacting with an NFT environment. This enables us to test the impact of design choices (e.g., feedback quality, biomarker validity) and subject factors (e.g., prior beliefs) on training. Simulations show that training effectiveness is sensitive to feedback noise or bias, and to prior beliefs (highlighting the importance of guiding instructions), but also reveal that perfect feedback is insufficient to guarantee high performance. This approach provides a tool for assessing and predicting NFT variability, interpret empirical data, and potentially develop personalized training protocols.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

Neurofeedback training has variable outcomes and unclear mechanisms
A computational model is needed to understand NFT design and subject factors
Feedback quality and prior beliefs significantly impact training effectiveness
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

Active Inference models NFT closed loop
Bayesian framework simulates agent interactions
Assesses feedback quality and prior beliefs
🔎 Similar Papers
No similar papers found.
C
Come Annicchiarico
COPHY Team, Lyon Neuroscience Research Center, CRNL, INSERM, U1028, Lyon, FRANCE
Fabien Lotte
Fabien Lotte
Inria Centre at the University of Bordeaux / LaBRI
Brain-Computer InterfacesHuman-Computer InteractionMachine LearningEEGNeuroergonomics
J
J'er'emie Mattout
COPHY Team, Lyon Neuroscience Research Center, CRNL, INSERM, U1028, Lyon, FRANCE