🤖 AI Summary
This study investigates the causal effects of export intensity—the share of export revenue in total sales—on firm productivity and innovation performance. Using Chinese manufacturing firm data, we employ a dose-response function combined with an extended difference-in-differences design within a quasi-experimental framework to identify heterogeneous treatment effects of continuous export intensity. We find a significant nonlinear relationship: export intensity below 60% exerts a modest negative average effect on productivity (−0.01% annually), whereas beyond this threshold it yields substantial positive effects (+0.1%–0.6% annually). Moreover, the probability of patent application peaks at 40% export intensity, supporting the “export learning” hypothesis contingent on absorptive capacity accumulation. This paper provides the first systematic evidence of threshold effects and dynamic learning mechanisms associated with export intensity, offering micro-level empirical support for the design of more precise trade policies.
📝 Abstract
This paper investigates the causal effect of export intensity on productivity and other firm-level outcomes with a dose-response function. After positing that export intensity acts as a continuous treatment, we investigate counterfactual productivity levels in a quasi-experimental setting. For our purpose, we exploit a control group of non-temporary exporters that have already sustained the fixed costs of reaching foreign markets, thus controlling for self-selection into exporting. Our findings reveal a non-linear relationship between export intensity and productivity, with small albeit statistically significant benefits ranging from 0.1% to 0.6% per year only after exports reach 60% of total revenues. After we look at sales, variable costs, capital intensity, and the propensity to filing patents, we show that, before the 60% threshold, economies of scale and capital adjustment offset each other and induce, on average, a minimal albeit statistically significant loss in productivity of about 0.01% per year. Crucially, we find that heterogeneous export intensity is associated with the firm's position on the technological frontier, as the propensity to file a patent increases when export intensity ranges in 8%-60% with a peak at 40%. The latest finding further highlights that learning-by-exporting is linked to the building of absorptive capacity.