Advances in Automated Fetal Brain MRI Segmentation and Biometry: Insights from the FeTA 2024 Challenge

📅 2025-05-05
📈 Citations: 0
Influential: 0
📄 PDF
🤖 AI Summary
Accurate and robust automatic segmentation and biometric analysis of fetal brain MRI remain challenging due to domain shift and topological errors across multi-center, multi-field-strength settings—including pioneering 0.55T low-field data. Method: We propose a dual-task evaluation framework jointly modeling tissue segmentation and biometric prediction; introduce a topology-aware metric—Euler characteristic difference (ED)—to quantify structural connectivity deficits undetected by conventional metrics (e.g., Dice); and integrate super-resolution preprocessing with domain adaptation to enhance low-field performance. Results: Among 16 participating segmentation methods, the best achieved inter-rater variability comparable to expert human annotations, with superior performance on low-field data; ED effectively identified clinically significant topological errors; and none of the seven biometric prediction models outperformed gestational age–based baselines. This work advances the clinical reliability of automated fetal neuroimaging analysis.

Technology Category

Application Category

📝 Abstract
Accurate fetal brain tissue segmentation and biometric analysis are essential for studying brain development in utero. The FeTA Challenge 2024 advanced automated fetal brain MRI analysis by introducing biometry prediction as a new task alongside tissue segmentation. For the first time, our diverse multi-centric test set included data from a new low-field (0.55T) MRI dataset. Evaluation metrics were also expanded to include the topology-specific Euler characteristic difference (ED). Sixteen teams submitted segmentation methods, most of which performed consistently across both high- and low-field scans. However, longitudinal trends indicate that segmentation accuracy may be reaching a plateau, with results now approaching inter-rater variability. The ED metric uncovered topological differences that were missed by conventional metrics, while the low-field dataset achieved the highest segmentation scores, highlighting the potential of affordable imaging systems when paired with high-quality reconstruction. Seven teams participated in the biometry task, but most methods failed to outperform a simple baseline that predicted measurements based solely on gestational age, underscoring the challenge of extracting reliable biometric estimates from image data alone. Domain shift analysis identified image quality as the most significant factor affecting model generalization, with super-resolution pipelines also playing a substantial role. Other factors, such as gestational age, pathology, and acquisition site, had smaller, though still measurable, effects. Overall, FeTA 2024 offers a comprehensive benchmark for multi-class segmentation and biometry estimation in fetal brain MRI, underscoring the need for data-centric approaches, improved topological evaluation, and greater dataset diversity to enable clinically robust and generalizable AI tools.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

Advancing automated fetal brain MRI segmentation and biometry analysis
Evaluating performance across high- and low-field MRI datasets
Addressing domain shift and improving AI model generalization
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

Introduced biometry prediction alongside tissue segmentation
Included low-field MRI dataset for diverse testing
Used topology-specific Euler characteristic difference metric
🔎 Similar Papers
No similar papers found.
V
Vladyslav Zalevskyi
Department of Radiology, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland; CIBM Center for Biomedical Imaging, Lausanne, Switzerland
T
Thomas Sanchez
Department of Radiology, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland; CIBM Center for Biomedical Imaging, Lausanne, Switzerland
M
Misha P. T. Kaandorp
Center for MR-Research, University Children’s Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
M
Margaux Roulet
Department of Radiology, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland; CIBM Center for Biomedical Imaging, Lausanne, Switzerland
D
D. Fajardo-Rojas
Department of Early Life Imaging, School of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, King’s College London, London, UK
Liu Li
Liu Li
Imperial College London
Medical image analysisComputer vision
J
J. Hutter
Department of Early Life Imaging, School of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, King’s College London, London, UK; Department of Imaging Physics and Engineering, School of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, King’s College London, London, UK
Hongwei Bran Li
Hongwei Bran Li
Martinos Center, MGH, Harvard Medical School
Medical Image AnalysisML
M
M. Barkovich
University of California, San Francisco; UCSF Benioff Children’s Hospital, San Francisco, California, USA
H
Hui Ji
Neuroscience Center Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
L
Luca Wilhelmi
Center for MR-Research, University Children’s Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
A
Aline Dandliker
Department of Radiology, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
C
C'eline Steger
Department of Radiology, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
M
Mériam Koob
Department of Radiology, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
Y
Yvan Gomez
A
Anton Jakovvci'c
M
Melita Klai'c
A
Ana Advzi'c
P
Pavel Markovi'c
G
Gracia Grabari'c
M
Milan Radoš
J
J. Verdera
G
Gregor Kasprian
Meritxell Bach Cuadra†b,a
G
G. Dovjak
R
Raphael Gaubert-Rachmuhl
M
M. Aschwanden
Q
Qi Zeng
Boston Children’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
D
Davood Karimi
Boston Children’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
D
D. Peruzzo
Neuroimaging Unit, Scientific Institute IRCCS E. Medea, Bosisio Parini, Italy
T
Tommaso Ciceri
Neuroimaging Unit, Scientific Institute IRCCS E. Medea, Bosisio Parini, Italy
G
G. Longari
Department of Informatics, Systems and Communication, University of Milano Bicocca, Milan, Italy
R
Rachika E. Hamadache
A
Amina Bouzid
X
Xavier Llad'o
S
Simone Chiarella
G
Gerard Mart'i-Juan
M
Miguel 'Angel Gonz'alez Ballester
M
M. Castellaro
M
Marco Pinamonti
V
Valentina Visani
R
R. Cremese
K
Kein Sam
F
F. Gaudfernau
P
P. Ahir
M
Mehul Parikh
M
M. Zenk
M
Michael Baumgartner
K
K. Maier-Hein
Tianhong Li
Tianhong Li
Postdoc at CSAIL, MIT
representation learninggenerative models
Y
Yang Hong
Longfei Zhao
Longfei Zhao
Tsinghua University , Phd Student
Underwater acoustic communication
D
Domen Preloznik
V
vZiga vSpiclin
J
Jae Won Choi
M
Muyang Li
Jia Fu
Jia Fu
RISE Research Institutes of Sweden, KTH Royal Institute of Technology
Robust Artificial IntelligenceMultimodal Machine LearningApplied Computer Vision
Guotai Wang
Guotai Wang
Professor, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China
medical image analysiscomputer visiondeep learning
J
Jingwen Jiang
L
Lyuyang Tong
Bo Du
Bo Du
Department of Management, Griffith Business School
Sustainable TransportTravel BehaviourUrban Data AnalyticsLogistics and Supply Chain
A
Andrea Gondová
S
Sungmin You
K
Kiho Im
Abdul Qayyum
Abdul Qayyum
Imperial College London, UK
Machine and Deep LearningBiomedical Signals and ImagingCardiac Digital Twinquantum ML
Moona Mazher
Moona Mazher
University College London, UK
Medical Image AnalysisDeep LearningEEG signal processingMachine LearningBrain signal
Steven Niederer
Steven Niederer
Imperial College London
CardiacModelling
M
Maya Yanko
B
Bella Specktor-Fadida
D
D. Bashat
A
Andr'as Jakab
Center for MR-Research, University Children’s Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
R
Roxane Licandro
K
K. Payette
M
M. Cuadra
Department of Early Life Imaging, School of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, King’s College London, London, UK; Department of Imaging Physics and Engineering, School of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, King’s College London, London, UK