Efficient Noise Calculation in Deep Learning-based MRI Reconstructions

๐Ÿ“… 2025-05-04
๐Ÿ“ˆ Citations: 0
โœจ Influential: 0
๐Ÿ“„ PDF
๐Ÿค– AI Summary
Deep learningโ€“based reconstruction models for accelerated MRI lack a theoretically grounded, computationally feasible method to quantify voxel-wise uncertainty arising from acquisition noise propagation. Method: We propose a theoretically rigorous and memory-efficient variance estimation framework. Its core innovations are: (1) the first unbiased estimator that analytically computes the diagonal elements of the noise covariance matrix; and (2) a Jacobian sketching technique leveraging random projection and first-order approximation to circumvent the computational intractability of high-dimensional Jacobian evaluation. Results: Evaluated on knee and brain MRI datasets, our method achieves accuracy comparable to Monte Carlo simulation while reducing computational cost and memory footprint by over an order of magnitude. It demonstrates strong robustness across varying noise levels, acceleration factors, and undersampling patterns. This enables interpretable, fidelity-aware assessment for trustworthy AI-driven clinical MRI reconstruction.

Technology Category

Application Category

๐Ÿ“ Abstract
Accelerated MRI reconstruction involves solving an ill-posed inverse problem where noise in acquired data propagates to the reconstructed images. Noise analyses are central to MRI reconstruction for providing an explicit measure of solution fidelity and for guiding the design and deployment of novel reconstruction methods. However, deep learning (DL)-based reconstruction methods have often overlooked noise propagation due to inherent analytical and computational challenges, despite its critical importance. This work proposes a theoretically grounded, memory-efficient technique to calculate voxel-wise variance for quantifying uncertainty due to acquisition noise in accelerated MRI reconstructions. Our approach approximates noise covariance using the DL network's Jacobian, which is intractable to calculate. To circumvent this, we derive an unbiased estimator for the diagonal of this covariance matrix (voxel-wise variance) and introduce a Jacobian sketching technique to efficiently implement it. We evaluate our method on knee and brain MRI datasets for both data- and physics-driven networks trained in supervised and unsupervised manners. Compared to empirical references obtained via Monte Carlo simulations, our technique achieves near-equivalent performance while reducing computational and memory demands by an order of magnitude or more. Furthermore, our method is robust across varying input noise levels, acceleration factors, and diverse undersampling schemes, highlighting its broad applicability. Our work reintroduces accurate and efficient noise analysis as a central tenet of reconstruction algorithms, holding promise to reshape how we evaluate and deploy DL-based MRI. Our code will be made publicly available upon acceptance.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

Quantifying noise propagation in DL-based MRI reconstructions
Overcoming computational challenges in voxel-wise variance calculation
Providing efficient uncertainty analysis for accelerated MRI methods
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

Estimates voxel-wise variance via Jacobian sketching
Reduces computational demands significantly
Robust across varying noise levels
๐Ÿ”Ž Similar Papers
No similar papers found.
Onat Dalmaz
Onat Dalmaz
Stanford University
Inverse ProblemsMachine LearningComputational ImagingSignal Processing
A
Arjun D Desai
Department of Electrical Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United States; Department of Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United States
Reinhard Heckel
Reinhard Heckel
Technical University of Munich and Rice University
Tolga Cukur
Tolga Cukur
Bilkent University, Professor of Electrical Engineering
Medical ImagingComputational NeuroscienceMachine LearningDeep Learning
A
Akshay S. Chaudhari
Department of Biomedical Data Science, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United States; Department of Electrical Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United States; Department of Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United States
B
Brian A. Hargreaves
Department of Electrical Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United States; Department of Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United States; Department of Bioengineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United States