🤖 AI Summary
This work addresses the systemic risks posed by the global deployment of multilingual large language models, which often overlook cultural diversity and exacerbate inequities for low-resource language communities in data fairness, value alignment, and accountability. Moving beyond technocentrism, the study pioneers a culturally grounded governance framework that centers cultural rights, local norms, and power structures. Through human-centered computing and cross-cultural socio-technical analysis, it integrates data equity assessment with participatory policy design to systematically identify three core governance challenges. The paper offers actionable design and policy recommendations to ensure multilingual AI systems do not reinforce global inequalities under the guise of scale and neutrality, thereby advancing more just and inclusive AI governance.
📝 Abstract
Multilingual large language models (MLLMs) are increasingly deployed across cultural, linguistic, and political contexts, yet existing governance frameworks largely assume English-centric data, homogeneous user populations, and abstract notions of fairness. This creates systematic risks for low-resource languages and culturally marginalized communities, where data practices, model behavior, and accountability mechanisms often fail to align with local norms, rights, and expectations. Drawing on cross-cultural perspectives in human-centered computing and AI governance, this paper synthesizes existing evidence on multilingual model behavior, data asymmetries, and sociotechnical harm, and articulates a culturally grounded governance framework for MLLMs. We identify three interrelated governance challenges: cultural and linguistic inequities in training data and evaluation practices, misalignment between global deployment and locally situated norms, values, and power structures, and limited accountability mechanisms for addressing harms experienced by marginalized language communities. Rather than proposing new technical benchmarks, we contribute a conceptual agenda that reframes multilingual AI governance as a sociocultural and rights based problem. We outline design and policy implications for data stewardship, transparency, and participatory accountability, and argue that culturally grounded governance is essential for ensuring that multilingual language models do not reproduce existing global inequalities under the guise of scale and neutrality.