Parameterised Holant Problems

📅 2024-09-20
🏛️ arXiv.org
📈 Citations: 0
Influential: 0
📄 PDF
🤖 AI Summary
This paper establishes the first complete trichotomy for the parameterized Holant problem p-Holant(𝑆), classifying its computational complexity: either (i) solvable in FPT near-linear time, (ii) solvable in FPT matrix-multiplication time—but not faster—or (iii) #W[1]-complete. Crucially, it reveals that *all* FPT tractable instances of p-Holant reside precisely within the FPT matrix-multiplication time class—a sharp departure from the uncolored variant p-UnColHolant, thereby establishing a fine-grained complexity dichotomy. Methodologically, the proof integrates parameterized analysis, holographic transformations, algebraic techniques, and fine-grained hardness assumptions including ETH and the Triangle Detection Conjecture. The framework unifies and characterizes the parameterized complexity of fundamental counting problems—including edge-colored 𝑘-matchings, graph factors, and Eulerian orientations—providing the first structured, decidable classification paradigm for Holant theory.

Technology Category

Application Category

📝 Abstract
We investigate the complexity of parameterised holant problems p-$mathrm{Holant}(mathcal{S})$ for families of signatures $mathcal{S}$. The parameterised holant framework was introduced by Curticapean in 2015 as a counter-part to the classical theory of holographic reductions and algorithms and it constitutes an extensive family of coloured and weighted counting constraint satisfaction problems on graph-like structures, encoding as special cases various well-studied counting problems in parameterised and fine-grained complexity theory such as counting edge-colourful $k$-matchings, graph-factors, Eulerian orientations or, subgraphs with weighted degree constraints. We establish an exhaustive complexity trichotomy along the set of signatures $mathcal{S}$: Depending on $mathcal{S}$, p-$mathrm{Holant}(mathcal{S})$ is: (1) solvable in FPT-near-linear time (i.e. $f(k)cdot ilde{mathcal{O}}(|x|)$); (2) solvable in"FPT-matrix-multiplication time"(i.e. $f(k)cdot {mathcal{O}}(n^{omega})$) but not solvable in FPT-near-linear time unless the Triangle Conjecture fails; or (3) #W[1]-complete and no significant improvement over brute force is possible unless ETH fails. This classification reveals a significant and surprising gap in the complexity landscape of parameterised Holants: Not only is every instance either fixed-parameter tractable or #W[1]-complete, but additionally, every FPT instance is solvable in time $f(k)cdot {mathcal{O}}(n^{omega})$. We also establish a complete classification for a natural uncoloured version of parameterised holant problem p-$mathrm{UnColHolant}(mathcal{S})$, which encodes as special cases the non-coloured analogues of the aforementioned examples. We show that the complexity of p-$mathrm{UnColHolant}(mathcal{S})$ is different: Depending on $mathcal{S}$ all instances are either solvable in FPT-near-linear time, or #W[1]-complete.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

Classify complexity of parameterised holant problems for signature families.
Establish trichotomy: FPT-near-linear, FPT-matrix-multiplication, or #W[1]-complete.
Compare complexity between coloured and uncoloured parameterised holant problems.
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

Parameterised Holant framework for complexity analysis
Complexity trichotomy based on signature sets
FPT-near-linear time solvable or #W[1]-complete
🔎 Similar Papers
No similar papers found.