Automated segmenta-on of pediatric neuroblastoma on multi-modal MRI: Results of the SPPIN challenge at MICCAI 2023

📅 2025-05-01
📈 Citations: 0
Influential: 0
📄 PDF
🤖 AI Summary
Manual preoperative MRI segmentation for pediatric neuroblastoma is time-consuming and operator-dependent, with no publicly available benchmark for extracranial pediatric tumor segmentation. Method: We establish the first multimodal MRI automatic segmentation benchmark and challenge specifically for pediatric retroperitoneal tumors, incorporating T1-weighted, T2-weighted, and DWI 3D volumes. We systematically evaluate the generalizability of large-scale pretrained models—particularly STU-Net—on small-scale, highly heterogeneous pediatric MRI data, using comprehensive metrics: Dice coefficient, Hausdorff distance at 95% (HD95), and volumetric similarity (VS). Contribution/Results: The winning model achieves a median Dice score of 0.82 (HD95 = 7.69 mm; VS = 0.91), demonstrating feasibility of automated segmentation. However, performance degrades markedly for post-chemotherapy small tumors (Dice = 0.59), revealing a critical robustness bottleneck for clinical deployment. This benchmark fills a key gap in pediatric oncologic imaging and provides actionable insights into model limitations under real-world clinical variability.

Technology Category

Application Category

📝 Abstract
Surgery plays an important role within the treatment for neuroblastoma, a common pediatric cancer. This requires careful planning, often via magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based anatomical 3D models. However, creating these models is often time-consuming and user dependent. We organized the Surgical Planning in Pediatric Neuroblastoma (SPPIN) challenge, to stimulate developments on this topic, and set a benchmark for fully automatic segmentation of neuroblastoma on multi-model MRI. The challenge started with a training phase, where teams received 78 sets of MRI scans from 34 patients, consisting of both diagnostic and post-chemotherapy MRI scans. The final test phase, consisting of 18 MRI sets from 9 patients, determined the ranking of the teams. Ranking was based on the Dice similarity coefficient (Dice score), the 95th percentile of the Hausdorff distance (HD95) and the volumetric similarity (VS). The SPPIN challenge was hosted at MICCAI 2023. The final leaderboard consisted of 9 teams. The highest-ranking team achieved a median Dice score 0.82, a median HD95 of 7.69 mm and a VS of 0.91, utilizing a large, pretrained network called STU-Net. A significant difference for the segmentation results between diagnostic and post-chemotherapy MRI scans was observed (Dice = 0.89 vs Dice = 0.59, P = 0.01) for the highest-ranking team. SPPIN is the first medical segmentation challenge in extracranial pediatric oncology. The highest-ranking team used a large pre-trained network, suggesting that pretraining can be of use in small, heterogenous datasets. Although the results of the highest-ranking team were high for most patients, segmentation especially in small, pre-treated tumors were insufficient. Therefore, more reliable segmentation methods are needed to create clinically applicable models to aid surgical planning in pediatric neuroblastoma.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

Automated segmentation of pediatric neuroblastoma on multi-modal MRI
Reducing time-consuming and user-dependent 3D model creation
Improving reliability for small, pre-treated tumor segmentation
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

Used large pre-trained STU-Net network
Multi-modal MRI for tumor segmentation
Benchmarked with Dice and Hausdorff metrics
🔎 Similar Papers
No similar papers found.
M
Myrthe A.D. Buser
Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, The Netherlands
D
Dominique C. Simons
Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, The Netherlands
M
Matthijs Fitski, PhD
Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, The Netherlands
M
Marc H.W.A. Wijnen
Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, The Netherlands
A
Annemieke S. Littooij
Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, The Netherlands; Department of Radiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
A
Annemiek H. ter Brugge
Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, The Netherlands
Iris N. Vos
Iris N. Vos
UMC Utrecht
Artificial IntelligenceGeometric Deep LearningMedical Image Analysis
M
Markus H.A. Janse
Image Sciences Institute, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
M
Mathijs de Boer
Image Sciences Institute, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
R
Rens ter Maat
Image Sciences Institute, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
J
Junya Sato
Department of Artificial Intelligence in Diagnostic Radiology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Japan
S
Shoji Kido
Department of Artificial Intelligence in Diagnostic Radiology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Japan
Satoshi Kondo
Satoshi Kondo
Muroran Institute of Technology (formerly, Konica Minolta, Inc., Panasonic corp.)
Computer vision
S
Satoshi Kasai
Niigata University of Health and Welfare, Niigata, Japan
M
Marek Wodzinski
AGH University of Krakow, Krakow, Poland; HES-SO Valais -Wallis, Valais, Switzerland
H
Henning Muller
HES-SO Valais -Wallis, Valais, Switzerland; University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
J
Jin Ye
Shanghai Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, Shanghai, China
Junjun He
Junjun He
Shanghai Jiao Tong University
Yannick Kirchhoff
Yannick Kirchhoff
PhD Student, DKFZ
Computer VisionDeep LearningMedical Image Computing
M
Maximilian R. Rokkus
Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany
G
Gao Haokai
South China Normal University, Guangzhou, China
S
Su Zitong
South China Normal University, Guangzhou, China
M
Matías Fernández-Patón
La Fe Health Research Institute, Valencia, Spain
D
Diana Veiga-Canuto
La Fe Health Research Institute, Valencia, Spain
D
David G. Ellis
University of Nebraska Medical Center, Nebraska, United States of America
M
Michele R. Aizenberg
University of Nebraska Medical Center, Nebraska, United States of America
B
Bas H.M. van der Velden
Image Sciences Institute, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands; Wageningen Food Safety Research, Wageningen, The Netherlands
H
Hugo Kuijf
Image Sciences Institute, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
A
Alberto de Luca
Image Sciences Institute, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
A
Alida F. W. van der Steeg
Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, The Netherlands