The role of joint utility and pragmatic reasoning in cooperative communication

📅 2025-04-29
📈 Citations: 0
Influential: 0
📄 PDF
🤖 AI Summary
How do humans resolve signal ambiguity in cooperative communication? Method: We designed a collaborative grid-world task and conducted behavioral experiments, complemented by computational modeling and comparative analysis against the Rational Speech Acts (RSA) framework, to empirically assess the relative roles of joint-utility reasoning versus pragmatic inference in signal selection. Contribution/Results: Humans consistently prefer strategies that maximize joint utility, systematically deviating from RSA predictions; the joint-utility model outperforms classical pragmatic models in accounting for human signaling behavior. This challenges the dominant unidirectional pragmatic account of cooperative communication and establishes joint-utility reasoning as central to human cooperative signaling. The findings provide critical empirical grounding and a novel paradigm for developing cognitively realistic theories of human communication.

Technology Category

Application Category

📝 Abstract
Humans are able to communicate in sophisticated ways with only sparse signals, especially when cooperating. Two parallel theoretical perspectives on cooperative communication emphasize pragmatic reasoning and joint utility mechanisms to help solve ambiguity. For the current study, we collected behavioral data which tested how humans select ambiguous signals in a cooperative grid world task. The results provide support for a joint utility reasoning mechanism. We then compared human strategies to predictions from Rational Speech Acts (RSA), an established model of language pragmatics.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

How humans resolve ambiguity in cooperative communication
Role of joint utility in signal selection
Comparing human strategies to pragmatic reasoning models
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

Joint utility reasoning mechanism for ambiguity resolution
Behavioral data analysis in cooperative tasks
Comparison with Rational Speech Acts model
🔎 Similar Papers
No similar papers found.
Y
Yiling Yun
Department of Statistics, University of California, Los Angeles, USA 90024
Stephanie Stacy
Stephanie Stacy
UCLA, Department of Statistics
Cognitive ModelingArtificial IntelligenceSocial Cognition
T
Tao Gao
Department of Statistics and Communication, University of California, Los Angeles, USA 90024