Anatomical Similarity as a New Metric to Evaluate Brain Generative Models

📅 2025-04-30
📈 Citations: 0
Influential: 0
📄 PDF
🤖 AI Summary
Current MRI synthesis evaluation overemphasizes texture and perceptual quality (e.g., PSNR, SSIM), neglecting clinically critical anatomical fidelity. To address this, we propose WASABI—a novel, differentiable, and comparable metric that quantifies anatomical plausibility via multivariate Wasserstein distance computed over regional brain volume distributions derived from SynthSeg-automated segmentation. Unlike conventional metrics, WASABI requires no manual annotations, is end-to-end differentiable, and effectively uncovers latent volumetric inaccuracies even in visually realistic synthetic images. Extensive experiments across two real-world MRI datasets and five state-of-the-art generative models demonstrate that WASABI significantly outperforms traditional metrics in sensitivity to anatomical distortions—particularly subtle volume deviations—and provides a more clinically meaningful assessment. By grounding evaluation in quantitative neuroanatomical consistency, WASABI shifts the paradigm of MRI synthesis validation from perception-oriented to clinical-trustworthiness-oriented.

Technology Category

Application Category

📝 Abstract
Generative models enhance neuroimaging through data augmentation, quality improvement, and rare condition studies. Despite advances in realistic synthetic MRIs, evaluations focus on texture and perception, lacking sensitivity to crucial anatomical fidelity. This study proposes a new metric, called WASABI (Wasserstein-Based Anatomical Brain Index), to assess the anatomical realism of synthetic brain MRIs. WASABI leverages extit{SynthSeg}, a deep learning-based brain parcellation tool, to derive volumetric measures of brain regions in each MRI and uses the multivariate Wasserstein distance to compare distributions between real and synthetic anatomies. Based on controlled experiments on two real datasets and synthetic MRIs from five generative models, WASABI demonstrates higher sensitivity in quantifying anatomical discrepancies compared to traditional image-level metrics, even when synthetic images achieve near-perfect visual quality. Our findings advocate for shifting the evaluation paradigm beyond visual inspection and conventional metrics, emphasizing anatomical fidelity as a crucial benchmark for clinically meaningful brain MRI synthesis. Our code is available at https://github.com/BahramJafrasteh/wasabi-mri.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

Evaluating anatomical fidelity in synthetic brain MRIs
Proposing WASABI metric for anatomical realism assessment
Comparing real and synthetic brain MRI distributions
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

Proposes WASABI metric for anatomical realism
Uses SynthSeg for brain region volumetrics
Compares distributions with Wasserstein distance
🔎 Similar Papers
No similar papers found.
B
Bahram Jafrasteh
Department of Radiology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA
W
Wei Peng
Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
Cheng Wan
Cheng Wan
Georgia Institute of Technology
Y
Yimin Luo
Department of Radiology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA
Ehsan Adeli
Ehsan Adeli
Stanford University
Computer VisionComputational NeurosciencePrecision HealthcareAmbient Intelligence
Qingyu Zhao
Qingyu Zhao
Assistant Professor, WCM, Cornell
Machine LearningNeuroimagingComputational Neuroscience