🤖 AI Summary
This paper addresses the relative pose estimation problem for three calibrated cameras given only four correspondences across all views. To overcome limitations of conventional methods—namely, their reliance on more correspondences or insufficient robustness—we propose a novel strategy that approximates a fifth correspondence using the centroid of the four observed points. We further introduce the first joint three-view pose estimation framework integrating a 4-point affine fundamental matrix solver, a standard 5-point relative pose solver, and a P3P solver. Geometric modeling enhances robustness against noise and outliers, while local optimization refines accuracy. Evaluated on real-world datasets, our method achieves state-of-the-art performance: the centroid-based strategy significantly outperforms pure affine approaches, striking a superior balance among accuracy, robustness, and computational efficiency, with straightforward implementation.
📝 Abstract
We study the challenging problem of estimating the relative pose of three calibrated cameras from four point correspondences. We propose novel efficient solutions to this problem that are based on the simple idea of using four correspondences to estimate an approximate geometry of the first two views. We model this geometry either as an affine or a fully perspective geometry estimated using one additional approximate correspondence. We generate such an approximate correspondence using a very simple and efficient strategy, where the new point is the mean point of three corresponding input points. The new solvers are efficient and easy to implement, since they are based on existing efficient minimal solvers, i.e., the 4-point affine fundamental matrix, the well-known 5-point relative pose solver, and the P3P solver. Extensive experiments on real data show that the proposed solvers, when properly coupled with local optimization, achieve state-of-the-art results, with the novel solver based on approximate mean-point correspondences being more robust and accurate than the affine-based solver.
