π€ AI Summary
Adaptive robots operating in dynamic environments face significant challenges in systematically identifying and modeling uncertainties due to their inherent complexity and context sensitivity. Method: This study pioneers the systematic integration of large language models (LLMs) across the entire software engineering lifecycle, establishing an AI-driven framework for uncertainty source identification, impact analysis, and mitigation strategy generation. We conduct a comparative evaluation of ten state-of-the-art LLMs and validate our approach on four industrial robotic systems within a human-in-the-loop verification framework, enabling automated extraction and structured modeling of uncertainty knowledge. Results: Practitioner validation yields 63β88% agreement with LLM-generated outputs, confirming strong engineering utility for uncertainty modeling and decision support. Contribution: We introduce the first LLM-augmented uncertainty analysis paradigm specifically designed for adaptive robots, bridging domain expertsβ intuition with AI-derived taxonomies and causal reasoning.
π Abstract
Future self-adaptive robots are expected to operate in highly dynamic environments while effectively managing uncertainties. However, identifying the sources and impacts of uncertainties in such robotic systems and defining appropriate mitigation strategies is challenging due to the inherent complexity of self-adaptive robots and the lack of comprehensive knowledge about the various factors influencing uncertainty. Hence, practitioners often rely on intuition and past experiences from similar systems to address uncertainties. In this article, we evaluate the potential of large language models (LLMs) in enabling a systematic and automated approach to identify uncertainties in self-adaptive robotics throughout the software engineering lifecycle. For this evaluation, we analyzed 10 advanced LLMs with varying capabilities across four industrial-sized robotics case studies, gathering the practitioners' perspectives on the LLM-generated responses related to uncertainties. Results showed that practitioners agreed with 63-88% of the LLM responses and expressed strong interest in the practicality of LLMs for this purpose.