Estimating Dense-Packed Zone Height in Liquid-Liquid Separation: A Physics-Informed Neural Network Approach

📅 2026-01-26
📈 Citations: 0
Influential: 0
📄 PDF
🤖 AI Summary
This study addresses the challenge of economically and accurately estimating the phase interface height in liquid–liquid gravity separation, a critical yet difficult-to-measure variable that hinders process monitoring and safety. The authors propose a two-stage training strategy for a physics-informed neural network (PINN) that incorporates only the volume conservation equation, thereby avoiding complex submodels. The approach first pretrains the PINN using synthetic data generated from a low-fidelity mechanistic model and then fine-tunes it with sparse experimental measurements, enabling high-accuracy interface height estimation from inlet flow rates alone. Furthermore, this work presents the first integration of a differentiable PINN into an extended Kalman filter–like framework, facilitating real-time state tracking and uncertainty quantification. Experimental results demonstrate that the method significantly outperforms purely data-driven models and non-pretrained PINNs in both forward simulation and filtering tasks, achieving state-of-the-art accuracy in phase interface height estimation.

Technology Category

Application Category

📝 Abstract
Separating liquid-liquid dispersions in gravity settlers is critical in chemical, pharmaceutical, and recycling processes. The dense-packed zone height is an important performance and safety indicator but it is often expensive and impractical to measure due to optical limitations. We propose to estimate phase heights using only inexpensive volume flow measurements. To this end, a physics-informed neural network (PINN) is first pretrained on synthetic data and physics equations derived from a low-fidelity (approximate) mechanistic model to reduce the need for extensive experimental data. While the mechanistic model is used to generate synthetic training data, only volume balance equations are used in the PINN, since the integration of submodels describing droplet coalescence and sedimentation into the PINN would be computationally prohibitive. The pretrained PINN is then fine-tuned with scarce experimental data to capture the actual dynamics of the separator. We then employ the differentiable PINN as a predictive model in an Extended Kalman Filter inspired state estimation framework, enabling the phase heights to be tracked and updated from flow-rate measurements. We first test the two-stage trained PINN by forward simulation from a known initial state against the mechanistic model and a non-pretrained PINN. We then evaluate phase height estimation performance with the filter, comparing the two-stage trained PINN with a two-stage trained purely data-driven neural network. All model types are trained and evaluated using ensembles to account for model parameter uncertainty. In all evaluations, the two-stage trained PINN yields the most accurate phase-height estimates.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

dense-packed zone height
liquid-liquid separation
phase height estimation
gravity settlers
flow-rate measurements
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

Physics-Informed Neural Network
Liquid-Liquid Separation
Dense-Packed Zone Height
Extended Kalman Filter
Two-Stage Training
🔎 Similar Papers
No similar papers found.
M
M. Velioglu
Institute of Climate and Energy Systems, Energy Systems Engineering (ICE-1), Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, Jülich 52425, Germany; RWTH Aachen University, Aachen 52062, Germany
S
Song Zhai
RWTH Aachen University, Fluid Process Engineering (AVT.FVT), Aachen 52074, Germany
Alexander Mitsos
Alexander Mitsos
AVT Systemverfahrenstechnik, RWTH Aachen University and Energy Systems Engineering IEK-10
process systems engineeringenergy systemsglobal optimizationbilevel optimizationprocess
A
A. Mhamdi
RWTH Aachen University, Process Systems Engineering (AVT.SVT), Aachen 52074, Germany
A
Andreas Jupke
RWTH Aachen University, Fluid Process Engineering (AVT.FVT), Aachen 52074, Germany; Institute for Bio- and Geosciences (IBG-2), Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, Jülich 52425, Germany
M
M. Dahmen
Institute of Climate and Energy Systems, Energy Systems Engineering (ICE-1), Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, Jülich 52425, Germany