Preference-based Centrality and Ranking in General Metric Spaces

📅 2026-01-26
📈 Citations: 0
Influential: 0
📄 PDF
🤖 AI Summary
This work addresses the limited resolution of traditional centrality and ranking methods in high-dimensional or multivariate non-Euclidean spaces, where intrinsic ordering structures are absent. The authors propose a novel centrality notion based on aggregate pairwise proximity comparisons: a point is deemed more central if typical samples from the distribution lie closer to it. By integrating the Bradley–Terry–Luce preference model with data depth for the first time, they establish a generalized centrality framework applicable to arbitrary metric spaces. Scalable finite-sample estimators are developed via convex M-estimation and spectral aggregation, enabling efficient one-dimensional ranking projections. The resulting method achieves both statistical consistency and computational scalability, demonstrating superior ranking stability and discriminative power over classical depth-based approaches across diverse complex data types.

Technology Category

Application Category

📝 Abstract
Assessing centrality or ranking observations in multivariate or non-Euclidean spaces is challenging because such data lack an intrinsic order and many classical depth notions lose resolution in high-dimensional or structured settings. We propose a preference-based framework that defines centrality through population pairwise proximity comparisons: a point is central if a typical draw from the underlying distribution tends to lie closer to it than to another. This perspective yields a well-defined statistical functional that generalizes data depth to arbitrary metric spaces. To obtain a coherent one-dimensional representation, we study a Bradley-Terry-Luce projection of the induced preferences and develop two finite-sample estimators based on convex M-estimation and spectral aggregation. The resulting procedures are consistent, scalable, and applicable to high-dimensional and non-Euclidean data, and across a range of examples they exhibit stable ranking behavior and improved resolution relative to classical depth-based methods.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

centrality
ranking
metric spaces
data depth
high-dimensional data
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

preference-based centrality
metric space depth
Bradley-Terry-Luce model
convex M-estimation
spectral aggregation
🔎 Similar Papers
No similar papers found.
L
Lingfeng Lyu
Department of Statistics and Data Science, National University of Singapore; Department of Statistics and Finance, University of Science and Technology of China
Doudou Zhou
Doudou Zhou
National University of Singapore
High-dimensional StatisticsEHR Data AnalysisChange-point DetectionTransfer Learning