🤖 AI Summary
This paper addresses the low efficiency of knowledge utilization in Byzantine fault-tolerant (BFT) consensus protocols by proposing a knowledge-logic-based automated optimization framework. Methodologically, it pioneers the extension of the MCK model-checking toolchain to enable fully automatic identification of optimization opportunities and synthesis of optimal protocols within epistemic logic, uniformly modeling both full-information and weak-information communication settings, and supporting optimality analysis for both synchronous and eventually consistent protocols. Contributions include: (1) overcoming the limitations of manual derivation by automatically identifying performance bottlenecks from the knowledge state space and synthesizing optimal protocols; and (2) establishing the first benchmark for knowledge-logic-based model checking and protocol synthesis for consensus, providing systematic evaluation metrics and empirical performance data. This work establishes a verifiable and reproducible paradigm for knowledge-driven design of distributed protocols.
📝 Abstract
Logics of knowledge and knowledge-based programs provide a way to give abstract descriptions of solutions to problems in fault-tolerant distributed computing, and have been used to derive optimal protocols for these problems with respect to a variety of failure models. Generally, these results have involved complex pencil and paper analyses with respect to the theoretical"full-information protocol"model of information exchange between network nodes. It is equally of interest to be able to establish the optimality of protocols using weaker, but more practical, models of information exchange, or else identify opportunities to improve their performance. Over the last 20 years, automated verification and synthesis tools for the logic of knowledge have been developed, such as the model checker MCK, that can be applied to this problem. This paper concerns the application of MCK to automated analyses of this kind. A number of information-exchange models are considered, for Simultaneous and Eventual variants of Byzantine Agreement under a range of failure types. MCK is used to automatically analyze these models. The results demonstrate that it is possible to automatically identify optimization opportunities, and to automatically synthesize optimal protocols. The paper provides performance measurements for the automated analysis, establishing a benchmark for epistemic model checking and synthesis tools.