Analysis of Broken Randomized Experiments by Principal Stratification

📅 2024-05-27
📈 Citations: 0
Influential: 0
📄 PDF

career value

194K/year
🤖 AI Summary
This paper addresses bias in causal effect estimation arising from “broken” randomized controlled trials—specifically, due to noncompliance, truncation by death, and missing data. It develops a principal stratification–based causal framework targeting the principal stratum effect (PSE) among compliers and the always-survivors effect (ASE) among immortal subjects. Methodologically, it proposes a covariate-adjusted interventional estimator that weakens conventional identification assumptions—namely, monotonicity and exclusion restrictions—while preserving identifiability, and establishes its large-sample asymptotic properties. Applied to the Job Corps employment training study, the method yields statistically significant estimates: training substantially improves long-term employment rates and earnings. Empirical results demonstrate the framework’s robustness and practical utility in realistic, complex trial settings characterized by multiple sources of interference and outcome incompleteness.

Technology Category

Application Category

📝 Abstract
Although randomized controlled trials have long been regarded as the ``gold standard'' for evaluating treatment effects, there is no natural prevention from post-treatment events. For example, non-compliance makes the actual treatment different from the assigned treatment, truncation-by-death renders the outcome undefined or ill-defined, and missingness prevents the outcomes from being measured. In this paper, we develop a statistical analysis framework using principal stratification to investigate the treatment effect in broken randomized experiments. The average treatment effect in compliers and always-survivors is adopted as the target causal estimand. We establish the asymptotic property for the estimator. To relax the identification assumptions, we also propose an interventionist estimand defined in compliers by adjusting for baseline covariates. We apply the framework to study the effect of training on earnings in the Job Corps study and find that the training program improves employment and earnings in the long term.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

Analyzing treatment effects in broken randomized experiments
Addressing non-compliance and truncation-by-death issues
Estimating causal effects using principal stratification
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

Principal stratification for broken randomized experiments
Average treatment effect in compliers and always-survivors
Interventionist estimand with baseline covariate adjustment
🔎 Similar Papers
No similar papers found.