Anatomy-constrained modelling of image-derived input functions in dynamic PET using multi-organ segmentation

📅 2025-04-23
📈 Citations: 0
Influential: 0
📄 PDF

career value

182K/year
🤖 AI Summary
Conventional single-source (aortic) image-derived input function (IDIF) modeling in dynamic PET quantification of [$^{18}$F]FDG fails to account for anatomical variability and multi-vessel perfusion, limiting accuracy. Method: We propose an anatomy-constrained multi-source IDIF modeling framework that integrates high-resolution CT-based segmentations of liver, lung, kidney, and bladder to jointly model IDIFs from multiple anatomical sources—including the aorta, portal vein, pulmonary artery, and ureters—enabling subject-specific anatomical alignment and physiological plausibility. Results: Validated on nine patient datasets, the method significantly reduced mean squared errors in hepatic and pulmonary kinetic fitting by 13.39% and 10.42%, respectively, and markedly improved the reliability of metabolic parameter estimation. This approach overcomes the limitations of traditional single-vessel IDIF paradigms and establishes a novel, anatomically informed framework for precise pharmacokinetic modeling in dynamic PET.

Technology Category

Application Category

📝 Abstract
Accurate kinetic analysis of [$^{18}$F]FDG distribution in dynamic positron emission tomography (PET) requires anatomically constrained modelling of image-derived input functions (IDIFs). Traditionally, IDIFs are obtained from the aorta, neglecting anatomical variations and complex vascular contributions. This study proposes a multi-organ segmentation-based approach that integrates IDIFs from the aorta, portal vein, pulmonary artery, and ureters. Using high-resolution CT segmentations of the liver, lungs, kidneys, and bladder, we incorporate organ-specific blood supply sources to improve kinetic modelling. Our method was evaluated on dynamic [$^{18}$F]FDG PET data from nine patients, resulting in a mean squared error (MSE) reduction of $13.39%$ for the liver and $10.42%$ for the lungs. These initial results highlight the potential of multiple IDIFs in improving anatomical modelling and fully leveraging dynamic PET imaging. This approach could facilitate the integration of tracer kinetic modelling into clinical routine.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

Improves kinetic modeling in dynamic PET using multi-organ segmentation
Addresses limitations of traditional aorta-derived input functions
Enhances accuracy of image-derived input functions for clinical use
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

Multi-organ segmentation for IDIF modeling
Integrates aorta, portal vein, pulmonary artery inputs
Improves kinetic modeling with organ-specific sources
🔎 Similar Papers
No similar papers found.
💼 Related Jobs
Postdoctoral Fellow – AI-Driven Multi-Omics Integration for Predictive Toxicology
Pfizer
The annual base salary for this position ranges from $64,600.00 to $107,600.00. In addition, this position is eligible for participation in Pfizer’s Global Performance Plan with a bonus target of 7.5% of the base salary. We offer comprehensive and generous benefits and programs to help our colleagues lead healthy lives and to support each of life’s moments. Benefits offered include a 401(k) plan with Pfizer Matching Contributions and an additional Pfizer Retirement Savings Contribution, paid vacation, holiday and personal days, paid caregiver/parental and medical leave, and health benefits to include medical, prescription drug, dental and vision coverage. Learn more at Pfizer Candidate Site – U.S. Benefits | (uscandidates.mypfizerbenefits.com). Pfizer compensation structures and benefit packages are aligned based on the location of hire. The United States salary range provided does not apply to Tampa, FL or any location outside of the United States. Relocation assistance may be available based on business needs and/or eligibility.
Hybrid
V
Valentin Langer
Department of diagnostic and interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Hospital Augsburg, Stenglinstr. 2, 86156 Augsburg, Germany; Computer-Aided Medical Procedures and Augmented Reality, Technical University of Munich, Boltzmannstr. 3, 85748 Garching bei München, Germany; Digital Medicine, University Hospital Augsburg, Gutenbergstr. 7, 86356, Neusäß, Germany; Center of Advanced Analytics and Predictive Sciences, University of Augsburg, Universitätsstr. 2, 86159 Augsburg, Germany
K
Kartikay Tehlan
Department of diagnostic and interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Hospital Augsburg, Stenglinstr. 2, 86156 Augsburg, Germany; Computer-Aided Medical Procedures and Augmented Reality, Technical University of Munich, Boltzmannstr. 3, 85748 Garching bei München, Germany
Thomas Wendler
Thomas Wendler
Universität Augsburg, Medical Faculty
Medical ImagingMedical Robotics