Proving Cypher Query Equivalence

📅 2025-04-22
📈 Citations: 0
Influential: 0
📄 PDF
🤖 AI Summary
Automated verification of Cypher query equivalence in graph databases remains challenging, as existing SQL-based equivalence tools are inapplicable due to fundamental differences in data models and semantics. Method: This paper introduces GraphQE, the first formal, fully automated framework for proving Cypher query equivalence. Its core innovation is the first algebraic semantic model of Cypher based on unbounded semirings (U-semirings), which reduces equivalence checking to an SMT-solvable problem; it integrates the Z3 solver for end-to-end verification. The framework rigorously formalizes Cypher syntax, property-graph semantics, and query behavior. Contribution/Results: Evaluated on a benchmark of 148 equivalent query pairs, GraphQE achieves a 93.2% proof accuracy—significantly outperforming SQL-adapted approaches. It establishes both a theoretical foundation and a practical tool for graph query optimization and reliability assurance.

Technology Category

Application Category

📝 Abstract
Graph database systems store graph data as nodes and relationships, and utilize graph query languages (e.g., Cypher) for efficiently querying graph data. Proving the equivalence of graph queries is an important foundation for optimizing graph query performance, ensuring graph query reliability, etc. Although researchers have proposed many SQL query equivalence provers for relational database systems, these provers cannot be directly applied to prove the equivalence of graph queries. The difficulty lies in the fact that graph query languages (e.g., Cypher) adopt significantly different data models (property graph model vs. relational model) and query patterns (graph pattern matching vs. tabular tuple calculus) from SQL. In this paper, we propose GraphQE, an automated prover to determine whether two Cypher queries are semantically equivalent. We design a U-semiring based Cypher algebraic representation to model the semantics of Cypher queries. Our Cypher algebraic representation is built on the algebraic structure of unbounded semirings, and can sufficiently express nodes and relationships in property graphs and complex Cypher queries. Then, determining the equivalence of two Cypher queries is transformed into determining the equivalence of the corresponding Cypher algebraic representations, which can be verified by SMT solvers. To evaluate the effectiveness of GraphQE, we construct a dataset consisting of 148 pairs of equivalent Cypher queries. Among them, we have successfully proven 138 pairs of equivalent Cypher queries, demonstrating the effectiveness of GraphQE.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

Proving equivalence of Cypher graph queries automatically
Addressing differences in data models and query patterns
Transforming query equivalence to algebraic representation verification
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

U-semiring based algebraic representation for Cypher
Transform query equivalence to algebraic equivalence
Verify equivalence using SMT solvers
🔎 Similar Papers
No similar papers found.
Lei Tang
Lei Tang
Unknown affiliation
Social ComputingData MiningCommunity DetectionComputational Advertising
Wensheng Dou
Wensheng Dou
Professor, Institute of Software Chinese Academy of Sciences (ISCAS)
software analysis and testingdatabase systemsdistributed systemsspreadsheet
Yingying Zheng
Yingying Zheng
Institute of Software, Chinese Academy of Sciences
Software Testing
Lijie Xu
Lijie Xu
Institute of Software, Chinese Academy of Sciences
DatabaseMachine LearningBig data systems
W
Wei Wang
Key Lab of System Software, State Key Laboratory of Computer Science, Institute of Software, Chinese Academy of Sciences; University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing; University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Nanjing; Nanjing Institute of Software Technology
J
Jun Wei
Key Lab of System Software, State Key Laboratory of Computer Science, Institute of Software, Chinese Academy of Sciences; University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing; University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Nanjing; Nanjing Institute of Software Technology
T
Tao Huang
Key Lab of System Software, State Key Laboratory of Computer Science, Institute of Software, Chinese Academy of Sciences; University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing