π€ AI Summary
This study addresses a critical limitation of conventional dyadic regression models, which assume dependence only among dyads sharing a common nodeβan assumption that fails when nodes are ordered and neighboring units are subject to common shocks, leading to biased inference. The paper provides the first systematic treatment of weak dependence arising between dyads without shared endpoints due to ordered nodes and proposes two asymptotically valid robust inference methods: a cluster-robust variance estimator (CRVE) that preserves the covariance structure of neighboring dyads, and a row-and-column moving-block jackknife. Under a weak dependence framework, the authors establish the corresponding asymptotic theory. Monte Carlo simulations demonstrate that both methods substantially improve size control in hypothesis testing, with the jackknife exhibiting superior stability in finite samples.
π Abstract
Dyadic regression models are commonly analyzed under the conventional dyadic dependence paradigm, in which two observations may be dependent only if the corresponding dyads share a node. This paper studies inference when this paradigm breaks down because nodes are ordered and nearby nodes are exposed to common latent shocks. In this setting, dyads with no common endpoint may still be dependent when their endpoints are close in the ordering. Although each additional covariance term may be weak, the number of nearby-node dyad pairs diverges with the sample size, so their aggregate contribution to the asymptotic variance can be non-negligible. We develop an inferential framework for dyadic arrays with ordered-node dependence. The first estimator is a dependent-node dyadic CRVE that retains covariance terms between dyads with nearby endpoints. The second is a row-column moving-block jackknife that deletes adjacent blocks of nodes together with all dyads touching those nodes. We establish the asymptotic validity of both procedures under weak dependence along the ordered node index. Monte Carlo evidence shows that accounting for ordered-node dependence can substantially improve size control, and that the jackknife version is comparatively stable in finite samples.