🤖 AI Summary
This work addresses the scarcity of low-cost, large-scale pixel-level annotations that limits current image manipulation localization (IML) methods. The authors propose a novel automatic annotation framework that obviates manual masks by efficiently extracting high-quality localization supervision from publicly available text-driven edited image pairs. Their approach leverages vision foundation models to compute semantic feature discrepancies, integrates instruction-guided spatial priors, and introduces several key innovations—including bidirectional cross-modal refinement, VAE round-trip noise calibration, EMA-based self-training, and an editing-noise disentanglement loss—to effectively bridge the domain gap between diffusion-based image editing and IML training. Evaluated on five benchmarks, the method substantially outperforms existing approaches (+12.20% F1, +11.16% IoU) and yields a 1.1-million-sample IML training set that boosts the average F1 score of six detectors by 18.34%.
📝 Abstract
Text-driven image editing has advanced rapidly, but reliably localizing these manipulations requires image manipulation localization (IML) models trained on large pixel-annotated datasets, and there is still no low-cost way to obtain such training data at scale. We observe that these data already exist in disguise: public editing datasets contain millions of structurally identical (original, edited) pairs to IML training samples, lacking only pixel-level masks. Recovering these masks automatically is non-trivial: pixel differencing is overwhelmed by diffusion-induced perturbations across all pixels, and instruction-only grounding localizes only what the prompt describes, missing unintended editor side-effects. We propose SIGMA (Semantic-difference Instruction-Grounding Mask Annotator), which performs semantic-feature differencing in a vision foundation backbone and injects an instruction-derived spatial prior into this visual stream via bidirectional cross-modal refinement, amplifying the difference signal at intended-edit regions when the editor faithfully realizes user intent. SIGMA is trained in two complementary stages: Stage I supervises on inpainting masks; Stage II closes the diffusion-domain shift via VAE-roundtrip noise calibration, EMA self-training, and an edit-noise disentanglement loss. SIGMA outperforms existing automatic mask generators on five benchmarks (+12.20% F1, +11.16% IoU). When applied to public editing corpora, it produces a ~1.1M IML training set that improves six diverse detectors by +18.34% F1 across five datasets, turning previously unused editing data into a model-agnostic supervisory resource for IML. We'll release the full codebase as soon as the paper is accepted.