🤖 AI Summary
Current large language models (LLMs) rely on supervised fine-tuning (SFT) for tool-use learning, exhibiting poor generalization; reinforcement learning (RL) approaches are hindered by coarse-grained rewards (e.g., final answer matching), failing to guide fine-grained tool selection and parameter invocation. Method: We propose the first multi-dimensional reward design framework tailored for tool-calling tasks, systematically characterizing reward types, granularity, and temporal structure to establish a principled, fine-grained reward mechanism. Leveraging Group Relative Policy Optimization (GRPO), we enable end-to-end RL training for tool calling. Contribution/Results: Our method achieves significant improvements—+15% over SFT baselines and +17% absolute gain across multiple benchmarks—while demonstrating enhanced training robustness, scalability, and stability.
📝 Abstract
Current Large Language Models (LLMs) often undergo supervised fine-tuning (SFT) to acquire tool use capabilities. However, SFT struggles to generalize to unfamiliar or complex tool use scenarios. Recent advancements in reinforcement learning (RL), particularly with R1-like models, have demonstrated promising reasoning and generalization abilities. Yet, reward design for tool use presents unique challenges: multiple tools may be invoked with diverse parameters, and coarse-grained reward signals, such as answer matching, fail to offer the finegrained feedback required for effective learning. In this work, we present the first comprehensive study on reward design for tool selection and application tasks within the RL paradigm. We systematically explore a wide range of reward strategies, analyzing their types, scales, granularity, and temporal dynamics. Building on these insights, we propose a principled reward design tailored for tool use tasks and apply it to train LLMs using Group Relative Policy Optimization (GRPO). Empirical evaluations across diverse benchmarks demonstrate that our approach yields robust, scalable, and stable training, achieving a 17% improvement over base models and a 15% gain over SFT models. These results highlight the critical role of thoughtful reward design in enhancing the tool use capabilities and generalization performance of LLMs. All the codes are released to facilitate future research.