Decentralized Signaling Mechanisms

📅 2025-04-19
📈 Citations: 0
Influential: 0
📄 PDF
🤖 AI Summary
This paper studies Bayesian persuasion for information design in multi-server systems, aiming to guide customer joining decisions via signaling mechanisms. We consider two settings: server states are either independent or correlated. First, we establish the first tight lower bound on the performance of decentralized (distributed) signaling mechanisms, proving that their utility loss decays controllably with the number of servers—and that this bound is asymptotically unimprovable. Second, we propose an efficient algorithm to compute the optimal decentralized signal and prove that the induced customer joining probability is at least a constant factor (depending only on the number of servers) of that under the optimal centralized mechanism—guaranteeing performance robustly across both independence and correlation settings, with asymptotic tightness. Our approach integrates tools from Bayesian persuasion, convex optimization, probabilistic analysis, and distributed information structure design.

Technology Category

Application Category

📝 Abstract
We study a system composed of multiple distinct service locations that aims to convince customers to join the system by providing information to customers. We cast the system's information design problem in the framework of Bayesian persuasion and describe centralized and decentralized signaling. We provide efficient methods for computing the system's optimal centralized and decentralized signaling mechanisms and derive a performance guarantee for decentralized signaling when the locations' states are independent. The guarantee states that the probability that a customer joins under optimal decentralized signaling is bounded below by the product of a strictly positive constant and the probability that a customer joins under optimal centralized signaling. The constant depends only on the number of service locations. We provide an example that shows that the constant cannot be improved. We consider an extension to more-general objectives for the system and establish that the same guarantee continues to hold. We also extend our analysis to systems where the locations' states are correlated, and again derive a performance guarantee for decentralized signaling in that setting. For the correlated setting, we prove that the guarantee's asymptotic dependence upon the number of locations cannot be substantially improved. A comparison of our guarantees for independent locations and for correlated locations reveals the influence of dependence on the performance of decentralized signaling.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

Study decentralized signaling in multi-location service systems
Compare performance of centralized vs decentralized signaling mechanisms
Analyze impact of location state dependence on signaling effectiveness
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

Bayesian persuasion for decentralized signaling mechanisms
Performance guarantees for independent location states
Extension to correlated location states analysis
🔎 Similar Papers
No similar papers found.