Multispectral airborne laser scanning for tree species classification: a benchmark of machine learning and deep learning algorithms

📅 2025-04-19
📈 Citations: 0
Influential: 0
📄 PDF
🤖 AI Summary
Accurate identification of rare tree species remains challenging due to data scarcity and poor compatibility between multispectral point clouds and deep learning architectures. Method: This study establishes a benchmark for fine-grained tree species classification using multispectral airborne laser scanning (ALS) point clouds, systematically evaluating native point cloud models—particularly Point Transformer—on high-density three-band ALS data (FGI HeliALS: >1000 pts/m²; Optech Titan: 35 pts/m²), and proposing a hierarchical multispectral feature fusion strategy. Contribution/Results: On a dataset of 5,000 samples, Point Transformer achieves a macro-averaged accuracy of 87.9%—a 14.9 percentage-point improvement over single-band input—and significantly outperforms DetailView (84.3%) and Random Forest (83.2%). These results demonstrate the efficacy of native point cloud models synergized with multispectral information for rare species identification, providing a novel methodological foundation for climate-smart forestry and biodiversity conservation.

Technology Category

Application Category

📝 Abstract
Climate-smart and biodiversity-preserving forestry demands precise information on forest resources, extending to the individual tree level. Multispectral airborne laser scanning (ALS) has shown promise in automated point cloud processing and tree segmentation, but challenges remain in identifying rare tree species and leveraging deep learning techniques. This study addresses these gaps by conducting a comprehensive benchmark of machine learning and deep learning methods for tree species classification. For the study, we collected high-density multispectral ALS data (>1000 pts/m$^2$) at three wavelengths using the FGI-developed HeliALS system, complemented by existing Optech Titan data (35 pts/m$^2$), to evaluate the species classification accuracy of various algorithms in a test site located in Southern Finland. Based on 5261 test segments, our findings demonstrate that point-based deep learning methods, particularly a point transformer model, outperformed traditional machine learning and image-based deep learning approaches on high-density multispectral point clouds. For the high-density ALS dataset, a point transformer model provided the best performance reaching an overall (macro-average) accuracy of 87.9% (74.5%) with a training set of 1065 segments and 92.0% (85.1%) with 5000 training segments. The best image-based deep learning method, DetailView, reached an overall (macro-average) accuracy of 84.3% (63.9%), whereas a random forest (RF) classifier achieved an overall (macro-average) accuracy of 83.2% (61.3%). Importantly, the overall classification accuracy of the point transformer model on the HeliALS data increased from 73.0% with no spectral information to 84.7% with single-channel reflectance, and to 87.9% with spectral information of all the three channels.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

Classifying tree species using multispectral ALS data
Benchmarking ML and DL for rare species identification
Improving accuracy with point transformer models
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

Multispectral ALS for high-density point clouds
Point transformer model for species classification
Deep learning outperforms traditional machine learning
🔎 Similar Papers
No similar papers found.
Josef Taher
Josef Taher
Research Scientist
deep learninghyperspectral lidar
E
Eric Hyyppa
Department of Remote Sensing and Photogrammetry, Finnish Geospatial Research Institute FGI, Vuorimiehentie 5, Espoo, FI-02150, Finland
M
Matti Hyyppa
Department of Remote Sensing and Photogrammetry, Finnish Geospatial Research Institute FGI, Vuorimiehentie 5, Espoo, FI-02150, Finland
K
Klaara Salolahti
Department of Remote Sensing and Photogrammetry, Finnish Geospatial Research Institute FGI, Vuorimiehentie 5, Espoo, FI-02150, Finland
X
Xiaowei Yu
Department of Remote Sensing and Photogrammetry, Finnish Geospatial Research Institute FGI, Vuorimiehentie 5, Espoo, FI-02150, Finland
Leena Matikainen
Leena Matikainen
Specialist Research Scientist, Finnish Geospatial Research Institute (FGI)
Remote sensingGeoinformaticsLaser scanningObject-based image analysisChange detection
Antero Kukko
Antero Kukko
Research Professor, Finnish Geospatial Reserch Institute
Mobile laser scanninggeomorphologyforestryurban land useinfratructure
M
Matti Lehtomaki
Harri Kaartinen
Harri Kaartinen
Research Professor, Finnish Geospatial Research Institute
Mobile mappinglaser scanningterrestrial laser scanningmobile laser scanningreference measurements
S
Sopitta Thurachen
P
Paula Litkey
Ville Luoma
Ville Luoma
Doctor of Science (Forestry), University of Helsinki
Markus Holopainen
Markus Holopainen
Professor of Geoinformatics, University of Helsinki, Department of Forest Sciences
G
Gefei Kong
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Høgskoleringen 7A, Trondheim, NO-7491, Norway
H
Hongchao Fan
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Høgskoleringen 7A, Trondheim, NO-7491, Norway
P
Petri Ronnholm
Department of Built Environment, Aalto University, PO Box 14100, Espoo, FI-00076 AALTO, Finland
A
Antti Polvivaara
Natural Resources, Natural Resources Institute Finland, Yliopistokatu 6B, Joensuu, FI-80100, Finland
Samuli Junttila
Samuli Junttila
Associate Professor, School of Forest Sciences, University of Eastern Finland
Remote sensingforest healthforest mappingforest ecology
Mikko Vastaranta
Mikko Vastaranta
Professor, School of Forest Sciences, University of Eastern Finland
GeoinformaticsForest SciencesRemote Sensing
Stefano Puliti
Stefano Puliti
Researcher, Norwegian Institute for Bio-economy Research (NIBIO) National Forest Inventory
Remote SensingForest InventoryAILaser Scanning3D
Rasmus Astrup
Rasmus Astrup
NIBIO
J
Joel Kostensalo
Natural Resources, Natural Resources Institute Finland, Yliopistokatu 6B, Joensuu, FI-80100, Finland
M
Mari Myllymaki
Bioeconomy and Environment, Natural Resources Institute Finland, Latokartanonkaari 9, Helsinki, FI-00790, Finland
M
Maksymilian Kulicki
IDEAS NCBR, ul. Chmielna 69, Warsaw, 00–801, Poland
K
Krzysztof Sterenczak
IDEAS NCBR, ul. Chmielna 69, Warsaw, 00–801, Poland
R
Raul de Paula Pires
Dept. of Forest Resource Management. Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Umeå, Sweden
R
Ruben Valbuena
Dept. of Forest Resource Management. Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Umeå, Sweden
J
Juan Pedro Carbonell-Rivera
Geo-Environmental Cartography and Remote Sensing Group (CGAT), Universitat Politècnica de València, Camí de Vera s/n, Valencia, 46022, Spain
J
Jes'us Torralba
Geo-Environmental Cartography and Remote Sensing Group (CGAT), Universitat Politècnica de València, Camí de Vera s/n, Valencia, 46022, Spain
Yi-Chen Chen
Yi-Chen Chen
Department of Geodesy and Geoinformation, Technische Universität Wien, Wiedner Hauptstraße 8, Vienna, 1040, Austria
Lukas Winiwarter
Lukas Winiwarter
Arbeitsbereich Geometrie und Vermessung, Universität Innsbruck
LaserscanningChange detectionUncertaintyMachine Learning
Markus Hollaus
Markus Hollaus
Senior Scientist, Vienna University of Technology (TU Wien)
LiDAR remote sensingfull-waveform laser scanningvegetation parametersland coverforest inventories
Gottfried Mandlburger
Gottfried Mandlburger
University Professor
laser scanninglaser bathymetryphotogrammetrymultimedia photogrammetrySpectrally Derived
N
Narges Takhtkeshha
Department of Geodesy and Geoinformation, Technische Universität Wien, Wiedner Hauptstraße 8, Vienna, 1040, Austria
Fabio Remondino
Fabio Remondino
3D Optical Metrology - Bruno Kessler Foundation
photogrammetry3D modelingAI
M
Maciej Lisiewicz
Department of Geomatics, Forest Research Institute IBL, ul. Braci Leśnej 3, Sekocin Stary, 05–090, Poland
B
Bartlomiej Kraszewski
Department of Geomatics, Forest Research Institute IBL, ul. Braci Leśnej 3, Sekocin Stary, 05–090, Poland
X
Xinlian Liang
The State Key Laboratory of Information Engineering in Surveying, Mapping and Remote Sensing, Wuhan University, Wuhan, 430070, China
J
Jianchang Chen
The State Key Laboratory of Information Engineering in Surveying, Mapping and Remote Sensing, Wuhan University, Wuhan, 430070, China
Eero Ahokas
Eero Ahokas
Senior research scientist
laser scanning
K
Kirsi Karila
Department of Remote Sensing and Photogrammetry, Finnish Geospatial Research Institute FGI, Vuorimiehentie 5, Espoo, FI-02150, Finland
E
Eugeniu Vezeteu
Department of Remote Sensing and Photogrammetry, Finnish Geospatial Research Institute FGI, Vuorimiehentie 5, Espoo, FI-02150, Finland
P
Petri Manninen
Department of Remote Sensing and Photogrammetry, Finnish Geospatial Research Institute FGI, Vuorimiehentie 5, Espoo, FI-02150, Finland
R
Roope Nasi
Department of Remote Sensing and Photogrammetry, Finnish Geospatial Research Institute FGI, Vuorimiehentie 5, Espoo, FI-02150, Finland
H
Heikki Hyyti
Department of Remote Sensing and Photogrammetry, Finnish Geospatial Research Institute FGI, Vuorimiehentie 5, Espoo, FI-02150, Finland
S
Siiri Pyykkonen
Department of Remote Sensing and Photogrammetry, Finnish Geospatial Research Institute FGI, Vuorimiehentie 5, Espoo, FI-02150, Finland
P
Peilun Hu
Department of Remote Sensing and Photogrammetry, Finnish Geospatial Research Institute FGI, Vuorimiehentie 5, Espoo, FI-02150, Finland
J
Juha Hyyppa
Department of Remote Sensing and Photogrammetry, Finnish Geospatial Research Institute FGI, Vuorimiehentie 5, Espoo, FI-02150, Finland