π€ AI Summary
This study investigates how adolescents aged 12 to 16 understand and circumvent age verification mechanisms on social media platforms, critically assessing the efficacy and legitimacy of such regulatory measures. Drawing on five focus groups and participatory observation, and framed within a sociotechnical systems perspective, the research reveals that young users do not merely passively evade rules but actively probe and negotiate digital infrastructures. The paper introduces the concept of βsneakingβ as a theoretical lens to foreground the dynamic social interactions between children and platform governance. Findings indicate that adolescents widely perceive age-based restrictions as both unjust and ineffective, underscoring the inadequacy of relying solely on chronological age as a regulatory criterion in addressing complex socio-technical challenges of digital governance.
π Abstract
Australia's social media ban is now in force. It requires platforms to take reasonable steps to stop users under 16 from holding accounts. Drawing on five focus groups with fifteen young people aged 12--16, this paper examines how children understood the ban's effectiveness, impact, and legitimacy as they encountered the platforms charged with enforcing it. Participants widely saw the ban as unfair and ineffective. Through platform access controls, they learned how the ban worked, where it failed, and how they and their peers could evade it. We also asked participants to imagine better approaches to age verification and youth digital governance. This paper develops sneaking as a theoretical lens for these practices. The concept names more than evasion: it captures the social encounter between children, platforms, techno-regulation, and the access controls that mediate digital participation. Our findings show that children are not passive subjects of platform regulation. They interpret, test, and negotiate digital infrastructure. They also expose a central weakness in age-based platform regulation: technological controls struggle to solve the social and governance problems they are asked to contain.