š¤ AI Summary
Current trajectory prediction models treat each frameās prediction as an independent instantaneous task, lacking error correction during inferenceāleading to error accumulation and poor long-term consistency. To address this, we propose an inference-time closed-loop backtracking learning mechanism: the first dynamic reflection-and-correction paradigm for trajectory prediction that leverages historical error feedback. Our approach employs a temporal state reflection module to explicitly model prediction deviations, integrates error-aggregated feedback, and adopts closed-loop rollout training to enable autonomous identification and correction of systematic errors during inference. The method is jointly optimized on nuScenes and Argoverse benchmarks, achieving a 31.9% reduction in minimum average displacement error (minADE). It significantly enhances robustness in long-horizon prediction and generalization to out-of-distribution scenariosāsuch as those involving undetected traffic participantsādemonstrating improved real-world deployability.
š Abstract
In automated driving, predicting trajectories of surrounding vehicles supports reasoning about scene dynamics and enables safe planning for the ego vehicle. However, existing models handle predictions as an instantaneous task of forecasting future trajectories based on observed information. As time proceeds, the next prediction is made independently of the previous one, which means that the model cannot correct its errors during inference and will repeat them. To alleviate this problem and better leverage temporal data, we propose a novel retrospection technique. Through training on closed-loop rollouts the model learns to use aggregated feedback. Given new observations it reflects on previous predictions and analyzes its errors to improve the quality of subsequent predictions. Thus, the model can learn to correct systematic errors during inference. Comprehensive experiments on nuScenes and Argoverse demonstrate a considerable decrease in minimum Average Displacement Error of up to 31.9% compared to the state-of-the-art baseline without retrospection. We further showcase the robustness of our technique by demonstrating a better handling of out-of-distribution scenarios with undetected road-users.