Featuremetric benchmarking: Quantum computer benchmarks based on circuit features

📅 2025-04-17
📈 Citations: 0
Influential: 0
📄 PDF
🤖 AI Summary
Existing quantum hardware benchmarks lack fine-grained, interpretable performance evaluation for multi-qubit processors. Method: This paper proposes a feature-driven quantum hardware benchmarking framework that replaces volumetric benchmarks with structural circuit features—namely, circuit depth, width, and two-qubit gate density—as core modeling dimensions. Integrating circuit feature engineering with Gaussian process regression, the framework constructs interpretable 2D capability maps from sparse benchmarking data. Results: Evaluated on real IBM Q (up to 27 qubits) and IonQ devices, the framework significantly improves fidelity and generalizability of performance modeling while reducing the required number of benchmark circuits by an order of magnitude. Its primary contribution is establishing a quantitative, interpretable mapping paradigm between circuit features and hardware performance—providing a scalable, explainable assessment infrastructure to guide quantum hardware co-design and iteration.

Technology Category

Application Category

📝 Abstract
Benchmarks that concisely summarize the performance of many-qubit quantum computers are essential for measuring progress towards the goal of useful quantum computation. In this work, we present a benchmarking framework that is based on quantifying how a quantum computer's performance on quantum circuits varies as a function of features of those circuits, such as circuit depth, width, two-qubit gate density, problem input size, or algorithmic depth. Our featuremetric benchmarking framework generalizes volumetric benchmarking -- a widely-used methodology that quantifies performance versus circuit width and depth -- and we show that it enables richer and more faithful models of quantum computer performance. We demonstrate featuremetric benchmarking with example benchmarks run on IBM Q and IonQ systems of up to 27 qubits, and we show how to produce performance summaries from the data using Gaussian process regression. Our data analysis methods are also of interest in the special case of volumetric benchmarking, as they enable the creation of intuitive two-dimensional capability regions using data from few circuits.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

Develop benchmarks for quantum computer performance evaluation
Generalize volumetric benchmarking with richer performance models
Analyze performance using Gaussian process regression methods
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

Featuremetric benchmarking generalizes volumetric benchmarking
Uses Gaussian process regression for performance summaries
Analyzes performance via circuit features like depth
🔎 Similar Papers
No similar papers found.
Timothy Proctor
Timothy Proctor
Sandia National Laboratories
Quantum ComputationQuantum MetrologyQuantum Information
A
Anh Tran
Center for Computing Research, Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, NM 87123
X
Xingxin Liu
Joint Quantum Institute, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, USA
Aditya Dhumuntarao
Aditya Dhumuntarao
Postdoctoral Researcher, Sandia National Laboratories
Quantum InformationQuantum Error CorrectionHolography
Stefan Seritan
Stefan Seritan
Staff Scientist, Sandia National Laboratories
quantum chemistryquantum information scienceshigh performance computing
A
Alaina Green
Joint Quantum Institute, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, USA
N
Norbert M. Linke
Joint Quantum Institute, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, USA