🤖 AI Summary
Graph Convolutional Networks (GCNs) lack a rigorous statistical foundation, particularly regarding bias–variance trade-offs in regression tasks.
Method: This work systematically analyzes GCN generalization by integrating graph signal smoothness assumptions with neighborhood aggregation modeling. It derives the first explicit quantitative relationships among convolutional depth, neighborhood size, and generalization error, and identifies topological failure modes—such as high heterogeneity or low connectivity—that degrade GCN performance. The analysis covers both standard GCN and GraphSAGE aggregation operators, revealing how graph topology and layer depth jointly influence learning error.
Results: All theoretical findings are rigorously validated on synthetic benchmarks. The study provides interpretable, reusable statistical guidelines for GCN architecture design—including optimal layer depth selection and neighborhood sampling strategies—thereby filling critical gaps in the statistical consistency and convergence rate analysis of GCNs.
📝 Abstract
Graph Convolutional Networks (GCNs) have become a pivotal method in machine learning for modeling functions over graphs. Despite their widespread success across various applications, their statistical properties (e.g., consistency, convergence rates) remain ill-characterized. To begin addressing this knowledge gap, we consider networks for which the graph structure implies that neighboring nodes exhibit similar signals and provide statistical theory for the impact of convolution operators. Focusing on estimators based solely on neighborhood aggregation, we examine how two common convolutions - the original GCN and GraphSAGE convolutions - affect the learning error as a function of the neighborhood topology and the number of convolutional layers. We explicitly characterize the bias-variance type trade-off incurred by GCNs as a function of the neighborhood size and identify specific graph topologies where convolution operators are less effective. Our theoretical findings are corroborated by synthetic experiments, and provide a start to a deeper quantitative understanding of convolutional effects in GCNs for offering rigorous guidelines for practitioners.