Towards Self-Optimizing Electron Microscope: Robust Tuning of Aberration Coefficients via Physics-Aware Multi-Objective Bayesian Optimization

📅 2026-01-26
📈 Citations: 0
Influential: 0
📄 PDF
🤖 AI Summary
This work addresses the limitations of conventional tuning methods in high-throughput aberration-corrected scanning transmission electron microscopy (STEM), which suffer from low sample efficiency and difficulty in jointly optimizing coupled aberration parameters, as well as the restricted generalizability of existing deep learning approaches. The authors propose a physics-aware multi-objective Bayesian optimization framework that integrates Gaussian process regression, user-defined physics-driven objective functions, and Pareto front analysis to efficiently explore the aberration space within an active learning loop. This method adapts seamlessly to varying sample conditions without retraining and demonstrates superior performance over traditional algorithms in correcting focus, astigmatism, and higher-order aberrations. It achieves enhanced robustness and data efficiency, thereby advancing electron microscopy toward a self-optimizing operational paradigm.

Technology Category

Application Category

📝 Abstract
Realizing high-throughput aberration-corrected Scanning Transmission Electron Microscopy (STEM) exploration of atomic structures requires rapid tuning of multipole probe correctors while compensating for the inevitable drift of the optical column. While automated alignment routines exist, conventional approaches rely on serial, gradient-free searches (e.g., Nelder-Mead) that are sample-inefficient and struggle to correct multiple interacting parameters simultaneously. Conversely, emerging deep learning methods offer speed but often lack the flexibility to adapt to varying sample conditions without extensive retraining. Here, we introduce a Multi-Objective Bayesian Optimization (MOBO) framework for rapid, data-efficient aberration correction. Importantly, this framework does not prescribe a single notion of image quality; instead, it enables user-defined, physically motivated reward formulations (e.g., symmetry-induced objectives) and uses Pareto fronts to expose the resulting trade-offs between competing experimental priorities. By using Gaussian Process regression to model the aberration landscape probabilistically, our workflow actively selects the most informative lens settings to evaluate next, rather than performing an exhaustive blind search. We demonstrate that this active learning loop is more robust than traditional optimization algorithms and effectively tunes focus, astigmatism, and higher-order aberrations. By balancing competing objectives, this approach enables"self-optimizing"microscopy by dynamically sustaining optimal performance during experiments.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

aberration correction
Scanning Transmission Electron Microscopy
multi-objective optimization
optical drift
high-throughput microscopy
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

Multi-Objective Bayesian Optimization
Aberration Correction
Physics-Aware Optimization
Active Learning
Scanning Transmission Electron Microscopy
🔎 Similar Papers
No similar papers found.
U
Utkarsh Pratiush
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN 37996, USA
A
Austin C Houston
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN 37996, USA
R
Richard Liu
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN 37996, USA
G
Gerd Duscher
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN 37996, USA
Sergei V. Kalinin
Sergei V. Kalinin
Weston Fulton Chair Professor, UT Knoxville. Chief Scientist, AI/ML for Physical Sciences, PNNL
AI4Materialsautomated experimentelectron microscopySPMatomic fabrication