Meta-Cognitive Reinforcement Learning with Self-Doubt and Recovery

๐Ÿ“… 2026-01-28
๐Ÿ“ˆ Citations: 0
โœจ Influential: 0
๐Ÿ“„ PDF

career value

162K/year
๐Ÿค– AI Summary
This work proposes a metacognitive reinforcement learning framework to address the challenge that existing methods struggle to assess their own learning reliability, often becoming overly conservative under noise or suffering catastrophic failure due to accumulated uncertainty. The framework introduces a meta-trust variable grounded in the stability of value prediction error (VPES), enabling agents to introspectively monitor, dynamically regulate, and recover trust in their learning process. By integrating fail-safe modulation with a progressive trust recovery mechanism, the approach significantly improves average returns and drastically reduces late-stage training failures in continuous control tasks with corrupted rewards. This enhances both the robustness and adaptability of agents operating in unreliable environments.

Technology Category

Application Category

๐Ÿ“ Abstract
Robust reinforcement learning methods typically focus on suppressing unreliable experiences or corrupted rewards, but they lack the ability to reason about the reliability of their own learning process. As a result, such methods often either overreact to noise by becoming overly conservative or fail catastrophically when uncertainty accumulates. In this work, we propose a meta-cognitive reinforcement learning framework that enables an agent to assess, regulate, and recover its learning behavior based on internally estimated reliability signals. The proposed method introduces a meta-trust variable driven by Value Prediction Error Stability (VPES), which modulates learning dynamics via fail-safe regulation and gradual trust recovery. Experiments on continuous-control benchmarks with reward corruption demonstrate that recovery-enabled meta-cognitive control achieves higher average returns and significantly reduces late-stage training failures compared to strong robustness baselines.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

robust reinforcement learning
learning reliability
reward corruption
uncertainty accumulation
catastrophic failure
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

meta-cognitive reinforcement learning
self-doubt
trust recovery
Value Prediction Error Stability
robust RL
Zhipeng Zhang
Zhipeng Zhang
School of Artificial Intelligence, Shanghai Jiao Tong University
Computer Vision๏ผŒObject Tracking and Segmentation
Wenting Ma
Wenting Ma
Powertrain System Modeling Engineer, Joby Aviation
K
Kai Li
China Mobile Research Institute, Beijing, China
M
Meng Guo
China Mobile Research Institute, Beijing, China
L
Lei Yang
China Mobile Research Institute, Beijing, China
W
Wei Yu
China Mobile Research Institute, Beijing, China
H
Hongji Cui
China Mobile GBA (Greater Bay Area) Innovation Institute, Guangzhou, China
Y
Yichen Zhang
China Mobile GBA (Greater Bay Area) Innovation Institute, Guangzhou, China
M
Mo Zhang
China Mobile GBA (Greater Bay Area) Innovation Institute, Guangzhou, China
J
Jinzhe Lin
China Mobile GBA (Greater Bay Area) Innovation Institute, Guangzhou, China
Z
Zhenjie Yao
Institute of Microelectronics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China