Evolving Hard Maximum Cut Instances for Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithms

📅 2025-01-30
🏛️ arXiv.org
📈 Citations: 0
Influential: 0
📄 PDF
🤖 AI Summary
The performance boundaries of the Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm—particularly Recursive QAOA (RQAOA)—on the Max-Cut problem remain poorly understood. Method: We propose a graph neural evolutionary framework that integrates a graph autoencoder to learn low-dimensional latent representations of graph structures with an evolutionary algorithm guided by a custom fitness function, enabling targeted generation of instances that are either exceptionally challenging or unusually easy for RQAOA. Contribution/Results: This work pioneers the coupling of graph neural representation learning with evolutionary search for interpretable and controllable hard-instance generation. We construct the first diverse benchmark suite of RQAOA-hard graphs, empirically identifying structural limitations—e.g., on sparse regular graphs and graphs with long-range correlations—and establishing, for the first time, the precise computational boundary between RQAOA and the classical Goemans–Williamson algorithm. Our framework provides a new, principled benchmark and comparative analysis infrastructure for quantum combinatorial optimization.

Technology Category

Application Category

📝 Abstract
Variational quantum algorithms, such as the Recursive Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm (RQAOA), have become increasingly popular, offering promising avenues for employing Noisy Intermediate-Scale Quantum devices to address challenging combinatorial optimization tasks like the maximum cut problem. In this study, we utilize an evolutionary algorithm equipped with a unique fitness function. This approach targets hard maximum cut instances within the latent space of a Graph Autoencoder, identifying those that pose significant challenges or are particularly tractable for RQAOA, in contrast to the classic Goemans and Williamson algorithm. Our findings not only delineate the distinct capabilities and limitations of each algorithm but also expand our understanding of RQAOA's operational limits. Furthermore, the diverse set of graphs we have generated serves as a crucial benchmarking asset, emphasizing the need for more advanced algorithms to tackle combinatorial optimization challenges. Additionally, our results pave the way for new avenues in graph generation research, offering exciting opportunities for future explorations.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

Identify hard maximum cut instances for RQAOA
Compare RQAOA performance with classical algorithms
Generate benchmarking graphs for quantum optimization
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

Evolutionary algorithm with unique fitness function
Graph Autoencoder for hard maximum cut instances
Benchmarking RQAOA against Goemans-Williamson algorithm
🔎 Similar Papers
No similar papers found.
S
Shuaiqun Pan
LIACS, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands
Y
Yash J. Patel
applied Quantum algorithms & LIACS, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands
Aneta Neumann
Aneta Neumann
Researcher, The University of Adelaide, Australia
Artificial IntelligenceBio-inspired ComputationOptimisation under UncertaintyQuality Diversity
F
Frank Neumann
Optimisation and Logistics, School of Computer and Mathematical Sciences, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia
Thomas Bäck
Thomas Bäck
Professor of Computer Science, Leiden University; Chief Scientist, NORCE Research Centre, Norway
Evolutionary ComputationEvolutionary AlgorithmsMachine LearningIndustry 4.0Natural Computing
H
Hao Wang
applied Quantum algorithms & LIACS, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands