Drift-to-Action Controllers: Budgeted Interventions with Online Risk Certificates

πŸ“… 2026-03-09
πŸ“ˆ Citations: 0
✨ Influential: 0
πŸ“„ PDF
πŸ€– AI Summary
This work addresses the lack of safe and controllable response mechanisms in machine learning systems under distribution shift by proposing a monitoring framework grounded in constrained safe decision-making. The approach identifies shift types at the perception layer and, for the first time, introduces an online risk certificate mechanism that provides a valid, anytime upper bound on current risk, thereby triggering tiered intervention strategies. Key technical components include unlabeled signal modeling, delayed label querying, test-time adaptation, and active abstention. Experiments on WILDS Camelyon17, DomainNet, and synthetic data streams demonstrate that the method achieves near-zero safety violations and rapid recovery, significantly outperforming existing baselines.

Technology Category

Application Category

πŸ“ Abstract
Deployed machine learning systems face distribution drift, yet most monitoring pipelines stop at alarms and leave the response underspecified under labeling, compute, and latency constraints. We introduce Drift2Act, a drift-to-action controller that treats monitoring as constrained decision-making with explicit safety. Drift2Act combines a sensing layer that maps unlabeled monitoring signals to a belief over drift types with an active risk certificate that queries a small set of delayed labels from a recent window to produce an anytime-valid upper bound $U_t(\delta)$ on current risk. The certificate gates operation: if $U_t(\delta) \le \tau$, the controller selects low-cost actions (e.g., recalibration or test-time adaptation); if $U_t(\delta)>\tau$, it activates abstain/handoff and escalates to rollback or retraining under cooldowns. In a realistic streaming protocol with label delay and explicit intervention costs, Drift2Act achieves near-zero safety violations and fast recovery at moderate cost on WILDS Camelyon17, DomainNet, and a controlled synthetic drift stream, outperforming alarm-only monitoring, adapt-always adaptation, schedule-based retraining, selective prediction alone, and an ablation without certification. Overall, online risk certification enables reliable drift response and reframes monitoring as decision-making with safety.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

distribution drift
budgeted interventions
online risk certification
safety constraints
machine learning monitoring
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

drift-to-action control
online risk certification
constrained decision-making
distribution drift
active monitoring
πŸ”Ž Similar Papers
No similar papers found.
I
Ismail Lamaakal
Multidisciplinary Faculty of Nador, Mohammed First University, Oujda 60000, Morocco
C
Chaymae Yahyati
Multidisciplinary Faculty of Nador, Mohammed First University, Oujda 60000, Morocco
Khalid El Makkaoui
Khalid El Makkaoui
Associate Professor, Dept. of Computer Science, FPDN, Mohammed First University, Nador, Morocco
Cryptography and its applicationsCloud SecurityIoT SecurityAI SecurityBlockchain Technology.
I
Ibrahim Ouahbi
Multidisciplinary Faculty of Nador, Mohammed First University, Oujda 60000, Morocco
Y
Yassine Maleh
Laboratory LaSTI, ENSAK, Sultan Moulay Slimane University, Khouribga 54000, Morocco