Unsupervised learning of acquisition variability in structural connectomes via hybrid latent space modeling

📅 2026-05-13
📈 Citations: 0
Influential: 0
📄 PDF

career value

241K/year
🤖 AI Summary
This study addresses the significant confounding effects of site, scanner, and acquisition protocol differences in multi-site diffusion MRI (dMRI) structural connectomes, which often obscure true biological variability. To tackle this challenge, the authors propose an unsupervised variational autoencoder framework that adaptively disentangles acquisition-related artifacts from biological signals by modeling a hybrid continuous-discrete latent space. A novel architecture-level annealing mechanism is introduced to dynamically balance the contributions of the two latent variable types at the encoder output, eliminating the need for manual hyperparameter tuning. Evaluated on a large multi-site dataset comprising 7,416 subjects, the method significantly outperforms baseline approaches (ARI = 0.53, p < 0.05) and effectively recovers clustering structures aligned with scanner and protocol configurations.
📝 Abstract
Acquisition differences across sites, scanners, and protocols in dMRI introduce variability that complicates structural connectome analysis. This motivates deep learning models that can represent high-dimensional connectomes in a low-dimensional space while explicitly separating acquisition-related effects from biological variation. Conventional dimensionality reduction methods model all variance as continuous, so acquisition effects often get absorbed into a continuous latent space. Recent hybrid latent-space models combine discrete and continuous components to address this, but typically require manual capacity tuning to ensure the discrete component captures the intended variability. We introduce an unsupervised framework that removes this manual tuning by architecturally annealing encoder outputs before decoding, allowing the model to adaptively balance discrete and continuous latent variables during training. To evaluate it, we curated a dataset of N=7,416 structural connectomes derived from dMRI, spanning ages 2 to 102 and 13 studies with 25 unique acquisition-parameter combinations. Of these, 5,900 are cognitively unimpaired, 877 have mild cognitive impairment (MCI), and 639 have Alzheimer's disease (AD). We compare against a standard VAE, PCA with k-means clustering, and hybrid models that anneal only through the loss function. Our architectural annealing produces stronger site learning (ARI=0.53, p<0.05) than these baselines. Results show that a hybrid continuous-discrete latent space, with architectural rather than loss-based annealing, provides a useful unsupervised mechanism for capturing acquisition variability in dMRI: by jointly modeling smooth and categorical structure, the Joint-VAE recovers clusters aligned with scanner and protocol differences.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

structural connectomes
acquisition variability
dMRI
unsupervised learning
latent space
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

hybrid latent space
architectural annealing
unsupervised disentanglement
structural connectome
dMRI acquisition variability
🔎 Similar Papers
No similar papers found.
Gaurav Rudravaram
Gaurav Rudravaram
Research Assistant
Deep LearningAIHistologyConnectomicsDiffusion
Lianrui Zuo
Lianrui Zuo
Vanderbilt University
Medical image analysisMRICTImage harmonizationImage synthesis
Karthik Ramadass
Karthik Ramadass
Vanderbilt University
Medical ImagingDeep LearningArtificial Intelligence
Elyssa McMaster
Elyssa McMaster
PhD Student, Vanderbilt University
Medical Imaging
Jongyeon Yoon
Jongyeon Yoon
PhD Student, Vanderbilt University
Deep Learning
A
Aravind R. Krishnan
Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA
Adam M. Saunders
Adam M. Saunders
PhD Student, Vanderbilt University
medical imagingdeep learningmagnetic resonance imaging
Chenyu Gao
Chenyu Gao
Electrical and Computer Engineering, Vanderbilt University
Medical Image AnalysisComputer Vision
N
Nancy R. Newlin
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
Praitayini Kanakaraj
Praitayini Kanakaraj
PhD Student, Vanderbilt University
Medical Image AnalysisNeuroimagingImaging InformaticsMachine Learning
L
Lori L. Beason Held
Laboratory of Behavioral Neuroscience, National Institute on Aging, National Institutes of Health, Baltimore, MD, USA
M
Murat Bilgel
Laboratory of Behavioral Neuroscience, National Institute on Aging, National Institutes of Health, Baltimore, MD, USA
L
Laura A. Barquero
Peabody College of Education and Human Development, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
M
Micah D'Archangel
Peabody College of Education and Human Development, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
T
Tin Q. Nguyen
Peabody College of Education and Human Development, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
L
Laurie B. Cutting
Peabody College of Education and Human Development, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
D
Derek Archer
Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Vanderbilt Memory & Alzheimer’s Center, Nashville, TN, USA
T
Timothy J. Hohman
Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Vanderbilt Memory & Alzheimer’s Center, Nashville, TN, USA
D
Daniel C. Moyer
Department of Computer Science, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA
B
Bennett A. Landman
Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA; Department of Computer Science, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA